<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top selling cameras for September 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/17/top-selling-cameras-for-september-2008.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/17/top-selling-cameras-for-september-2008.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:37:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Leandro</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/17/top-selling-cameras-for-september-2008.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9634</link>
		<dc:creator>Leandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1405#comment-9634</guid>
		<description>The result of Nikon D40 show that &quot;megapixel race&quot; is finishing.

Tks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The result of Nikon D40 show that &#8220;megapixel race&#8221; is finishing.</p>
<p>Tks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psyked</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/17/top-selling-cameras-for-september-2008.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9533</link>
		<dc:creator>psyked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1405#comment-9533</guid>
		<description>Having 3 in the top 3 means that Nikon is only losing sales of one camera to another one of their own camera lineup. Which is definitely better than losing it to a competitors&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having 3 in the top 3 means that Nikon is only losing sales of one camera to another one of their own camera lineup. Which is definitely better than losing it to a competitors&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/17/top-selling-cameras-for-september-2008.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9521</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1405#comment-9521</guid>
		<description>It keeps crashing my browser also. FYI- the D300 not being in the top 5 has nothing to do with dxo scores and everything to do with price. Camera companies sell a lot of &quot;cheap&quot; - if you can call them that- cameras and sales generally taper off as you move up the product line. For average consumers, paying over $1000 dollars for a camera is out of the question. $400-600 appears to be the sweet spot these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It keeps crashing my browser also. FYI- the D300 not being in the top 5 has nothing to do with dxo scores and everything to do with price. Camera companies sell a lot of &#8220;cheap&#8221; &#8211; if you can call them that- cameras and sales generally taper off as you move up the product line. For average consumers, paying over $1000 dollars for a camera is out of the question. $400-600 appears to be the sweet spot these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/17/top-selling-cameras-for-september-2008.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9517</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 02:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1405#comment-9517</guid>
		<description>I would say having 3 in the top five, unless that top seller sold more combined than either #2 and #3 together,  or #2,3,4 together. It would be interesting to see the numbers sold also.
I am sad my D300 did not make the list but after seeing how the dxomark rates the D300, I am not too surprised. However, the dxomark site keeps crashing my firefox so I quit looking at it. lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say having 3 in the top five, unless that top seller sold more combined than either #2 and #3 together,  or #2,3,4 together. It would be interesting to see the numbers sold also.<br />
I am sad my D300 did not make the list but after seeing how the dxomark rates the D300, I am not too surprised. However, the dxomark site keeps crashing my firefox so I quit looking at it. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rthomas</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/17/top-selling-cameras-for-september-2008.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9516</link>
		<dc:creator>rthomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1405#comment-9516</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say it&#039;s more impressive to have three of the top five, than to have the &quot;top&quot; camera. Also, the fact that the &quot;lowly&quot; 6MP D40 is number two in a market full of 10MP and higher sensors says a lot about Nikon&#039;s quality. I&#039;ve used the D40, and personally prefer the D70s. Having said that, the D40 an awesome entry-level camera; it&#039;s sales position confirms that, and as others here have noted, it is capable of great results if used well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s more impressive to have three of the top five, than to have the &#8220;top&#8221; camera. Also, the fact that the &#8220;lowly&#8221; 6MP D40 is number two in a market full of 10MP and higher sensors says a lot about Nikon&#8217;s quality. I&#8217;ve used the D40, and personally prefer the D70s. Having said that, the D40 an awesome entry-level camera; it&#8217;s sales position confirms that, and as others here have noted, it is capable of great results if used well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cameron</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/17/top-selling-cameras-for-september-2008.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9477</link>
		<dc:creator>cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1405#comment-9477</guid>
		<description>smart people buys dirty cheap D40 or D60 then invest in super expensive primes and zooms and shoot in RAW, really money-efficiency way to start photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>smart people buys dirty cheap D40 or D60 then invest in super expensive primes and zooms and shoot in RAW, really money-efficiency way to start photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobJ</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/17/top-selling-cameras-for-september-2008.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9476</link>
		<dc:creator>RobJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1405#comment-9476</guid>
		<description>That is pretty impressive.  I suspect the D90 would be higher on that list if it had a) been available the entire month, and b) been available body only.  I know a lot of people who waited for the body only version to come out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is pretty impressive.  I suspect the D90 would be higher on that list if it had a) been available the entire month, and b) been available body only.  I know a lot of people who waited for the body only version to come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willis</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/17/top-selling-cameras-for-september-2008.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-9475</link>
		<dc:creator>Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=1405#comment-9475</guid>
		<description>I suspect that if you added the D40x numbers to the D60,  then it would probably be number 1. That said, I love that the D40 is number 2. Its a great camera for what you pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that if you added the D40x numbers to the D60,  then it would probably be number 1. That said, I love that the D40 is number 2. Its a great camera for what you pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

