<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No more Nikon D3?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: kD</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-10331</link>
		<dc:creator>kD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-10331</guid>
		<description>D3 will be discontinued..
However, Nikon will extend it&#039;s upgrading services for existing D3 cameras (beyond the $550 buffer upgrade); sensor/firmware upgrade will cost a total of $1500, making the camera just short of the new D3X specifications.  Get in early as the wait will probably be long..
All info Dec.1st</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D3 will be discontinued..<br />
However, Nikon will extend it&#8217;s upgrading services for existing D3 cameras (beyond the $550 buffer upgrade); sensor/firmware upgrade will cost a total of $1500, making the camera just short of the new D3X specifications.  Get in early as the wait will probably be long..<br />
All info Dec.1st</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon D3x - what do we have so far &#124; Nikon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-10281</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon D3x - what do we have so far &#124; Nikon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-10281</guid>
		<description>[...] price of Nikon D3 dropped significantly to $4,200. There was also a rumor that retailers could not place D3 orders [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] price of Nikon D3 dropped significantly to $4,200. There was also a rumor that retailers could not place D3 orders [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyrieowl</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8953</link>
		<dc:creator>eyrieowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8953</guid>
		<description>ah, that&#039;s right, people only take pictures of the trunks and ignore those pesky branches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah, that&#8217;s right, people only take pictures of the trunks and ignore those pesky branches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cameron</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8951</link>
		<dc:creator>cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 02:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8951</guid>
		<description>moving trees? i never knew trees could walk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>moving trees? i never knew trees could walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily News. November 7 2008 &#124; Photo Daily News</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8947</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily News. November 7 2008 &#124; Photo Daily News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8947</guid>
		<description>[...] Nikon Rumors notes the Nikon Photo Contest International and what&#8217;s this? No more Nikon D3? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nikon Rumors notes the Nikon Photo Contest International and what&#8217;s this? No more Nikon D3? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhlpetrus</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8940</link>
		<dc:creator>rhlpetrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8940</guid>
		<description>Maybe a D3s, a minor update, more fps, larger buffer, something like that.

It&#039;s too early for a major revamp, like a 16MP sensor (that&#039;s possible for 2010, and the camera will likely be called D4).

Now, regarding D3X (high MP camera), my bet Nikon is waiting to see how the 5DII performs. There are hints its high ISO won&#039;t be as good as D3/D700, so different market. There&#039;s a spot for a 5-6 K USD pro body with 24MP for landscapers and studio shooters, but the IQ has to at least match that of 1DsIII/5DII, otherwise forget it. The A900&#039;s sensor doesn&#039;t look that good, hope Nikon has teaked it or gone for a different design, like they did with the D3&#039;s sensor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a D3s, a minor update, more fps, larger buffer, something like that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s too early for a major revamp, like a 16MP sensor (that&#8217;s possible for 2010, and the camera will likely be called D4).</p>
<p>Now, regarding D3X (high MP camera), my bet Nikon is waiting to see how the 5DII performs. There are hints its high ISO won&#8217;t be as good as D3/D700, so different market. There&#8217;s a spot for a 5-6 K USD pro body with 24MP for landscapers and studio shooters, but the IQ has to at least match that of 1DsIII/5DII, otherwise forget it. The A900&#8242;s sensor doesn&#8217;t look that good, hope Nikon has teaked it or gone for a different design, like they did with the D3&#8242;s sensor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spartan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8935</link>
		<dc:creator>Spartan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8935</guid>
		<description>Until D3 drops to $2k, I can&#039;t afford it.  So I don&#039;t give a rats ass about any rumor until I see online (new or used) a D3 for $2k.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until D3 drops to $2k, I can&#8217;t afford it.  So I don&#8217;t give a rats ass about any rumor until I see online (new or used) a D3 for $2k.  <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoetmb</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8931</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoetmb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8931</guid>
		<description>A new high-res DSLR would NOT replace the D3.  But a minor upgrade to the D3, like a D3s could replace the D3.  So the rumor is only credible if it&#039;s a minor update.  These things aren&#039;t necessarily announced to dealers, but the fact that one dealer above has D3s on backorder actually lends credence to the rumor.   (And I don&#039;t believe most rumors.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new high-res DSLR would NOT replace the D3.  But a minor upgrade to the D3, like a D3s could replace the D3.  So the rumor is only credible if it&#8217;s a minor update.  These things aren&#8217;t necessarily announced to dealers, but the fact that one dealer above has D3s on backorder actually lends credence to the rumor.   (And I don&#8217;t believe most rumors.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8925</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8925</guid>
		<description>D3 still think and fast in major London shop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D3 still think and fast in major London shop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Purton</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8922</link>
		<dc:creator>David Purton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8922</guid>
		<description>Yes..just found the D3 2..trying to down load the pdf but it seems reluctant.

Note, the D3 is still listed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes..just found the D3 2..trying to down load the pdf but it seems reluctant.</p>
<p>Note, the D3 is still listed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Purton</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8921</link>
		<dc:creator>David Purton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8921</guid>
		<description>May be see an up grade..often Nikon put useful features on the down priced model..(D700), so isn&#039;t it about time we had a D3 with sensor cleaning?

I doubt they would even consider dropping the D3 yet as a 12mp FF, but we could see an &quot;s&quot; version?

Any high res would surely be a separate model..(D4?) and run with the D3(s)..one for high iso, one for landscape/commercial...you should have both not either/or!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be see an up grade..often Nikon put useful features on the down priced model..(D700), so isn&#8217;t it about time we had a D3 with sensor cleaning?</p>
<p>I doubt they would even consider dropping the D3 yet as a 12mp FF, but we could see an &#8220;s&#8221; version?</p>
<p>Any high res would surely be a separate model..(D4?) and run with the D3(s)..one for high iso, one for landscape/commercial&#8230;you should have both not either/or!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8918</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8918</guid>
		<description>Bullhoey.

As has already been discussed at length on every Nikon related forum, a high MP count Full Frame Sensor is unlikely to have the low noise and dynamic range characteristics of the D3. The D3 and the speculated D3X/D4 will both remain the line up as they will fit different purposes. As a D3 owner, I have no interest in a high MP/High Noise D4. I&#039;m very happy with the D3 for my work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bullhoey.</p>
<p>As has already been discussed at length on every Nikon related forum, a high MP count Full Frame Sensor is unlikely to have the low noise and dynamic range characteristics of the D3. The D3 and the speculated D3X/D4 will both remain the line up as they will fit different purposes. As a D3 owner, I have no interest in a high MP/High Noise D4. I&#8217;m very happy with the D3 for my work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyrieowl</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8917</link>
		<dc:creator>eyrieowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8917</guid>
		<description>is that supposed to hint that the d3 is going bye?  extremely unlikely.  but, if it&#039;s just meant to indicate a temporary shortage in the supply chain, it seems conceivable that if they were releasing a high-res ff body *soon* that they would have temporarily drawn down d3 production to produce the new body....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is that supposed to hint that the d3 is going bye?  extremely unlikely.  but, if it&#8217;s just meant to indicate a temporary shortage in the supply chain, it seems conceivable that if they were releasing a high-res ff body *soon* that they would have temporarily drawn down d3 production to produce the new body&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyrieowl</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8916</link>
		<dc:creator>eyrieowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8916</guid>
		<description>and what percentage of photos do you suppose that is?  especially if you only count landscapes with no moving trees/birds/water...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what percentage of photos do you suppose that is?  especially if you only count landscapes with no moving trees/birds/water&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bibz</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8915</link>
		<dc:creator>Bibz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8915</guid>
		<description>How about landscape and architecture ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about landscape and architecture ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8914</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8914</guid>
		<description>From

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&amp;message=29934712

&quot;A good news maybe (to some), bad news to others: Nikon will introduce soon a high res FF. Today I had a chat with a friend of mine that owns the biggest local photo retailer and he told me that this rumor is mainly due to the fact that all photo retailers here cannot place orders for D3 anymore. D3 was not the distribution lists received from local distributor by all local retailers for orders.

One of the reasons may be introduction of a new high res FF, decrease of production due to the deflation etc. He told me that the new FF may be just around the corner, to be announced soon.

He&#039;s quite a reliable guy and I trust his words because his business relies mainly on Nikon and Canon sales.&quot;

Then take a look at 

https://www2.nikon.de/bilddatenbank.php?hauptordner=digital_slr 

Lets see whats announced on the 20th :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&#038;message=29934712" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&#038;message=29934712</a></p>
<p>&#8220;A good news maybe (to some), bad news to others: Nikon will introduce soon a high res FF. Today I had a chat with a friend of mine that owns the biggest local photo retailer and he told me that this rumor is mainly due to the fact that all photo retailers here cannot place orders for D3 anymore. D3 was not the distribution lists received from local distributor by all local retailers for orders.</p>
<p>One of the reasons may be introduction of a new high res FF, decrease of production due to the deflation etc. He told me that the new FF may be just around the corner, to be announced soon.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s quite a reliable guy and I trust his words because his business relies mainly on Nikon and Canon sales.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then take a look at </p>
<p><a href="https://www2.nikon.de/bilddatenbank.php?hauptordner=digital_slr" rel="nofollow">https://www2.nikon.de/bilddatenbank.php?hauptordner=digital_slr</a> </p>
<p>Lets see whats announced on the 20th <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8912</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8912</guid>
		<description>Load of bollocks. We can still order them. In fact we have them on backorder. We find out a few days before announcents at the EARLIEST. Most of time we hear about these things as the press releases are sent out.

I&#039;ve heard nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Load of bollocks. We can still order them. In fact we have them on backorder. We find out a few days before announcents at the EARLIEST. Most of time we hear about these things as the press releases are sent out.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8908</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8908</guid>
		<description>Uh, how many people in real life shoot things that don&#039;t move at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, how many people in real life shoot things that don&#8217;t move at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yasil</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8906</link>
		<dc:creator>yasil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8906</guid>
		<description>heard the same thing from a german source...
I think this would make sense, one cam for all purposes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heard the same thing from a german source&#8230;<br />
I think this would make sense, one cam for all purposes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lox</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/06/no-more-nikon-d3.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8905</link>
		<dc:creator>lox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=871#comment-8905</guid>
		<description>D3 and D3x would be completely different products for professional use. So a D3x would NOT be a replacement for the D3. Nikon would rather keep both lines as they did with the D2X(s) and D2H(s). On the other hand, the D3 has grown BIG in the pro camera market, especially among photo journalists. You would not discontinue a product that sells like the D3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D3 and D3x would be completely different products for professional use. So a D3x would NOT be a replacement for the D3. Nikon would rather keep both lines as they did with the D2X(s) and D2H(s). On the other hand, the D3 has grown BIG in the pro camera market, especially among photo journalists. You would not discontinue a product that sells like the D3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

