<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikkor 17-35mm officially discontinued</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:58:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: AF-S Zoom-NIKKOR 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED comes back in Europe &#124; Nikon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-18938</link>
		<dc:creator>AF-S Zoom-NIKKOR 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED comes back in Europe &#124; Nikon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-18938</guid>
		<description>[...] The rumor was that this lens was discontinued and was not present on many of the latest price lists. Not sure what is going on - maybe Nikon is just pushing its final stock.  This entry was posted in Nikon Lenses. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.   &#171; Please update your NikonRumors RSS feeds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The rumor was that this lens was discontinued and was not present on many of the latest price lists. Not sure what is going on &#8211; maybe Nikon is just pushing its final stock.  This entry was posted in Nikon Lenses. Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.   &laquo; Please update your NikonRumors RSS feeds [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nik_disco</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8930</link>
		<dc:creator>nik_disco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8930</guid>
		<description>Not discontinued according to the official Nikon Japan discontinued page: (as of today Nov 7, 08)

http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/discontinue/others/index.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not discontinued according to the official Nikon Japan discontinued page: (as of today Nov 7, 08)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/discontinue/others/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/discontinue/others/index.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikkor 17-35 mm - wycofany &#124; Cyfrowa pasja</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8909</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikkor 17-35 mm - wycofany &#124; Cyfrowa pasja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8909</guid>
		<description>[...] stronie Nikon Rumors, portalu donoszącym o różnych plotkach na temat produktów firmy Nikon pojawiła się [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stronie Nikon Rumors, portalu donoszącym o różnych plotkach na temat produktów firmy Nikon pojawiła się [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Catchall</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8891</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Catchall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8891</guid>
		<description>What a shame.  It was in a totally different class to the Canon 17-35 f2.8L.  It was much better than the Canon 16-35 f2.8L.  Maybe, on their 3rd attempt, Canon reached a similar standard with their 16-36 f2.8L II.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a shame.  It was in a totally different class to the Canon 17-35 f2.8L.  It was much better than the Canon 16-35 f2.8L.  Maybe, on their 3rd attempt, Canon reached a similar standard with their 16-36 f2.8L II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon 17-35mm officially out of production &#124; Gizmo Blog</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8861</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon 17-35mm officially out of production &#124; Gizmo Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8861</guid>
		<description>[...] via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoetmb</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8858</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoetmb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8858</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s not discontinued, but not having it on the pricelist in one country does not mean it&#039;s not available anywhere.   Sometimes, based on sales, local distributors or Nikon divisions elect not to carry a lens.

I forget which country, but last year one country dropped a lot of Nikon lenses from their pricelists, but they remain available in other countries to this day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s not discontinued, but not having it on the pricelist in one country does not mean it&#8217;s not available anywhere.   Sometimes, based on sales, local distributors or Nikon divisions elect not to carry a lens.</p>
<p>I forget which country, but last year one country dropped a lot of Nikon lenses from their pricelists, but they remain available in other countries to this day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CC</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8835</link>
		<dc:creator>CC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8835</guid>
		<description>The 17-35 is ready for an upgrade. 16-35 or even 16-40 would be very nice, it would then be even more useful as a normal zoom on DX.
It never really did shine on digital FF, and the performance was a bit uneven at f/2.8. I think Nikon can be able to fix these two problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 17-35 is ready for an upgrade. 16-35 or even 16-40 would be very nice, it would then be even more useful as a normal zoom on DX.<br />
It never really did shine on digital FF, and the performance was a bit uneven at f/2.8. I think Nikon can be able to fix these two problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bye, bye 17-35er &#124; Nikon-BLOG</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8833</link>
		<dc:creator>Bye, bye 17-35er &#124; Nikon-BLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8833</guid>
		<description>[...] “Lens Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S is discontinued and we don’t have any information about u... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Lens Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S is discontinued and we don’t have any information about u&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8827</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8827</guid>
		<description>It is if you compare it to the 14-24mm/f2.8! This is a pain - I might have bought a second hand 17-35, but now the used prices will go up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is if you compare it to the 14-24mm/f2.8! This is a pain &#8211; I might have bought a second hand 17-35, but now the used prices will go up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8816</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8816</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t know what lens you&#039;re using, but the 17-35 is neither small or light,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t know what lens you&#8217;re using, but the 17-35 is neither small or light,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8812</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8812</guid>
		<description>You can get many of these 17-35 in Singapore - Nikon SG has them listed still at SGD $3065 BUT.....  you can get it for between SGD $2450 and SGD $2750 if you ask around....   I spent 4 days deciding over this 17-35 or the 14-24 and got the 14-24 and my deciding factor was me being truly shattered!! if a NEW 17-35 came out in the next 6-12 months: Nikons PRO Lenses have a &quot;in the range life&quot; of 8-10 years (besides that I reckon when the replacement comes out It&#039;ll be a 16-35).......??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get many of these 17-35 in Singapore &#8211; Nikon SG has them listed still at SGD $3065 BUT&#8230;..  you can get it for between SGD $2450 and SGD $2750 if you ask around&#8230;.   I spent 4 days deciding over this 17-35 or the 14-24 and got the 14-24 and my deciding factor was me being truly shattered!! if a NEW 17-35 came out in the next 6-12 months: Nikons PRO Lenses have a &#8220;in the range life&#8221; of 8-10 years (besides that I reckon when the replacement comes out It&#8217;ll be a 16-35)&#8230;&#8230;.??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DNHJR</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8810</link>
		<dc:creator>DNHJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8810</guid>
		<description>I thought the replacement for this lens was the 14-24mm f2.8. Anyway, I prefer this lens over the 14-24mm. I really need to get this lens out and use it more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the replacement for this lens was the 14-24mm f2.8. Anyway, I prefer this lens over the 14-24mm. I really need to get this lens out and use it more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yrsued</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8804</link>
		<dc:creator>yrsued</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8804</guid>
		<description>I heard it will be discontinued soon, i was expecting the 70-200 to be replaced this year.  I guess they are still working ot it&#039;s replacement!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard it will be discontinued soon, i was expecting the 70-200 to be replaced this year.  I guess they are still working ot it&#8217;s replacement!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Rindner</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8796</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Rindner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8796</guid>
		<description>i have &amp; love this lense, its small and light, get one while you can

josh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have &amp; love this lense, its small and light, get one while you can</p>
<p>josh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8794</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8794</guid>
		<description>I bought all three of my pro zooms in the past year and a half, and two out of three of them have been discontinued:  28-70 f/2.8 and now the 17-35 f/2.8.  

I guess the 70-200 f/2.8 VR is next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought all three of my pro zooms in the past year and a half, and two out of three of them have been discontinued:  28-70 f/2.8 and now the 17-35 f/2.8.  </p>
<p>I guess the 70-200 f/2.8 VR is next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily News. November 4 2008 &#124; Photo Daily News</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8787</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily News. November 4 2008 &#124; Photo Daily News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8787</guid>
		<description>[...] Nikon Rumors says a store in Texas is taking deposits on the yet to be announced Nikon D4 and that the Nikon 17-35mm is officially discontinued [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nikon Rumors says a store in Texas is taking deposits on the yet to be announced Nikon D4 and that the Nikon 17-35mm is officially discontinued [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8776</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8776</guid>
		<description>Hopefully, there will be a very fine replacement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully, there will be a very fine replacement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no-zoom?</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/11/04/nikkor-17-35mm-officially-discontinued.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8775</link>
		<dc:creator>no-zoom?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/?p=798#comment-8775</guid>
		<description>So this means no more pro wide FX zoom that can take filters?
Either a replacement is imminent, or I don&#039;t get this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this means no more pro wide FX zoom that can take filters?<br />
Either a replacement is imminent, or I don&#8217;t get this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

