<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon &#8220;BIG&#8221; poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:16:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nikon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 23:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-562</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nikon medium format (MX) analysis&lt;/strong&gt;

Many readers think that those Nikon medium format ads are fake (even though the poll says otherwise). I would agree if it wasn&#039;t for ad #3 and the ad #1. Each one of the remaining ads could be created based on existing Nikon product images and a good knowledge of PS, but the viewfinder in ad #3 looks real to me. Can someone think of a camera that has similar shaped viewfinder? This seems to be difficult to fake (but not impossible). Note that all of the fake PS jobs are based on existing models. I haven&#039;t seen a fake ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nikon medium format (MX) analysis</strong></p>
<p>Many readers think that those Nikon medium format ads are fake (even though the poll says otherwise). I would agree if it wasn&#8217;t for ad #3 and the ad #1. Each one of the remaining ads could be created based on existing Nikon product images and a good knowledge of PS, but the viewfinder in ad #3 looks real to me. Can someone think of a camera that has similar shaped viewfinder? This seems to be difficult to fake (but not impossible). Note that all of the fake PS jobs are based on existing models. I haven&#8217;t seen a fake &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-561</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nikon medium format (MX) analysis&lt;/strong&gt;

Many readers think that those Nikon medium format ads are fake (even though the poll says otherwise). I would agree if it wasn&#039;t for ad #3 and the ad #1. Each one of the remaining ads could be created based on existing Nikon product images and a good knowledge of PS, but the viewfinder in ad #3 looks real to me. Can someone think of a camera that has similar shaped viewfinder? This seems to be difficult to fake (but not impossible). Note that all of the fake PS jobs are based on existing models. I haven&#039;t seen a fake ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nikon medium format (MX) analysis</strong></p>
<p>Many readers think that those Nikon medium format ads are fake (even though the poll says otherwise). I would agree if it wasn&#8217;t for ad #3 and the ad #1. Each one of the remaining ads could be created based on existing Nikon product images and a good knowledge of PS, but the viewfinder in ad #3 looks real to me. Can someone think of a camera that has similar shaped viewfinder? This seems to be difficult to fake (but not impossible). Note that all of the fake PS jobs are based on existing models. I haven&#8217;t seen a fake &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-560</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nikon medium format (MX) analysis&lt;/strong&gt;

Many readers think that those Nikon medium format ads are fake (even though the poll says otherwise). I would agree if it wasn&#039;t for ad #3 and the ad #1. Each one of the remaining ads could be created based on existing Nikon product images and a good knowledge of PS, but the viewfinder in ad #3 looks real to me. Can someone think of a camera that has similar shaped viewfinder? This seems to be difficult to fake (but not impossible). Note that all of the fake PS jobs are based on existing models. I haven&#039;t seen a fake ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nikon medium format (MX) analysis</strong></p>
<p>Many readers think that those Nikon medium format ads are fake (even though the poll says otherwise). I would agree if it wasn&#8217;t for ad #3 and the ad #1. Each one of the remaining ads could be created based on existing Nikon product images and a good knowledge of PS, but the viewfinder in ad #3 looks real to me. Can someone think of a camera that has similar shaped viewfinder? This seems to be difficult to fake (but not impossible). Note that all of the fake PS jobs are based on existing models. I haven&#8217;t seen a fake &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon Rumors</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-559</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nikon medium format (MX) analysis&lt;/strong&gt;

Many readers think that those Nikon medium format ads are fake (even though the poll says otherwise). I would agree if it wasn&#039;t for ad #3 and the ad #1. Each one of the remaining ads could be created based on existing Nikon product images and a good knowledge of PS, but the viewfinder in ad #3 looks real to me. Can someone think of a camera that has similar shaped viewfinder? This seems to be difficult to fake (but not impossible). The other problem I have is the red triangle on the handle of the first ad – the ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nikon medium format (MX) analysis</strong></p>
<p>Many readers think that those Nikon medium format ads are fake (even though the poll says otherwise). I would agree if it wasn&#8217;t for ad #3 and the ad #1. Each one of the remaining ads could be created based on existing Nikon product images and a good knowledge of PS, but the viewfinder in ad #3 looks real to me. Can someone think of a camera that has similar shaped viewfinder? This seems to be difficult to fake (but not impossible). The other problem I have is the red triangle on the handle of the first ad – the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoewreck</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoewreck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-558</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure that author of the &quot;ads&quot; reads nikonrumours and simply does it for fun. According to the comments of Japanese speaking guys the ads don&#039;t even come from Japan.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that author of the &#8220;ads&#8221; reads nikonrumours and simply does it for fun. According to the comments of Japanese speaking guys the ads don&#8217;t even come from Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-557</guid>
		<description>Unless it uses the aperture system in the new PC-E lenses (which, coincidently, are the right size)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The thing that got me was the third flange.  I barely voted no, because of the possibility of a locking pin, but I voted no
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless it uses the aperture system in the new PC-E lenses (which, coincidently, are the right size)</p>
<p>The thing that got me was the third flange.  I barely voted no, because of the possibility of a locking pin, but I voted no</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maurizio</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>maurizio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-556</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what that &quot;big&quot; thing will be, but I&#039;m sure that the sensor photo was a bad photoshop work!&lt;br /&gt;Along with the third flange the shopper removed also the diaphragm lever! &lt;br /&gt;The AF motor can be removed but the auto diaphragm lever must stay or the new big-ground-breaking Nikon will work in stopdown...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what that &#8220;big&#8221; thing will be, but I&#8217;m sure that the sensor photo was a bad photoshop work!<br />Along with the third flange the shopper removed also the diaphragm lever! <br />The AF motor can be removed but the auto diaphragm lever must stay or the new big-ground-breaking Nikon will work in stopdown&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trigger</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Trigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-555</guid>
		<description>In the first AD the sensor is rectangular instead a square shape according to the rumors. so i Think is a fake!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first AD the sensor is rectangular instead a square shape according to the rumors. so i Think is a fake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-554</guid>
		<description>Good point - I added another sentence to make it clear. Thanks.&lt;br&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point &#8211; I added another sentence to make it clear. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stj</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>stj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-553</guid>
		<description>The original add was in Rangefinder Magazine, so maybe it should be specified that we talk about the new photos of off-prints..
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original add was in Rangefinder Magazine, so maybe it should be specified that we talk about the new photos of off-prints..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-552</guid>
		<description>The new F7 with D3 autofocus system and integrated portrait grip.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new F7 with D3 autofocus system and integrated portrait grip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-551</guid>
		<description>lulz
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lulz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Pawned
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pawned</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smarter guy</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Smarter guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-549</guid>
		<description>Sorry but how dumb are you? Nikonrumors obviously put that in afterwards!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but how dumb are you? Nikonrumors obviously put that in afterwards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smart guy</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx/comment-page-1#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>smart guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/10/01/nikon-big-poll.aspx#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Of COURSE these Nikon ads are fake... the faker even left &quot;nikonrumors.com&quot; in the ad!  I don&#039;t think Nikon would be so sloppy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of COURSE these Nikon ads are fake&#8230; the faker even left &#8220;nikonrumors.com&#8221; in the ad!  I don&#8217;t think Nikon would be so sloppy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
