<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BIG! (busted)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:57:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Leping</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1734</link>
		<dc:creator>Leping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1734</guid>
		<description>Wow, some one bothered to let Dan at maxmax.com to remove the AA filter from his D3, and found the gain of sharpness is only minimal:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1021&amp;thread=29423041&amp;page=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1021&amp;thread=29423041&amp;page=1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;this means the D3/D700 &quot;look&quot; is not from a strong AA filter, so it actually support the rumor that they actually have the Sony&#039;s 24MP sensor in them and the 12MP out put are from some smart convolution of the pixels -- Nikon did such binning game before but this is far more likely than the D1x scheme.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, some one bothered to let Dan at maxmax.com to remove the AA filter from his D3, and found the gain of sharpness is only minimal:</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1021&#038;thread=29423041&#038;page=1" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1021&#038;thread=29423041&#038;page=1</a></p>
<p>this means the D3/D700 &#8220;look&#8221; is not from a strong AA filter, so it actually support the rumor that they actually have the Sony&#8217;s 24MP sensor in them and the 12MP out put are from some smart convolution of the pixels &#8212; Nikon did such binning game before but this is far more likely than the D1x scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Olsen</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1733</link>
		<dc:creator>David Olsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1733</guid>
		<description>I agree Floyd ..sometimes people let the truth get in the way of a good rumour .-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Floyd ..sometimes people let the truth get in the way of a good rumour .-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floyd</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>I LOVE this rumor.  It&#039;s like a thriller with a twist -- you know something&#039;s coming, but what could it be?... And then WHAM! Bruce Willis was dead all along; the injured cop is really Hannibal Lecter; the call is coming from INSIDE the house.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We&#039;re all looking around for a D3X and it turns out we&#039;ve owned them for a year!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, it&#039;s not true, but that&#039;s beside the point.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE this rumor.  It&#8217;s like a thriller with a twist &#8212; you know something&#8217;s coming, but what could it be?&#8230; And then WHAM! Bruce Willis was dead all along; the injured cop is really Hannibal Lecter; the call is coming from INSIDE the house.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re all looking around for a D3X and it turns out we&#8217;ve owned them for a year!</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s not true, but that&#8217;s beside the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1731</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1731</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the support!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the support!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1730</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1730</guid>
		<description>This one was busted, and it was a hard one to swallow, but...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;it&#039;s been done before!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fully plausible!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bon&#039;t down on the admin, it was a fully plausable rumer.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one was busted, and it was a hard one to swallow, but&#8230;</p>
<p>it&#8217;s been done before!</p>
<p>Fully plausible!</p>
<p>Bon&#8217;t down on the admin, it was a fully plausable rumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leping</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1729</link>
		<dc:creator>Leping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1729</guid>
		<description>Also remembered Nikon had never made it clear what exactly does the &quot;double micro lens&quot; design mean.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;A senior Nikon spokesman went as far to indicate that Nikon were using gap-less, double micro lens technology on the Nikon D3.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=27285&amp;pid=217259&amp;st=100&amp;#entry217259&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=27285&amp;pid=217259&amp;st=100&amp;#entry217259&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also remembered Nikon had never made it clear what exactly does the &#8220;double micro lens&#8221; design mean.</p>
<p>&#8220;A senior Nikon spokesman went as far to indicate that Nikon were using gap-less, double micro lens technology on the Nikon D3.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=27285&#038;pid=217259&#038;st=100&#entry217259" rel="nofollow">http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=27285&#038;pid=217259&#038;st=100&#038;#entry217259</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZoetMB</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1728</link>
		<dc:creator>ZoetMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1728</guid>
		<description>You guys will believe anything.  I never believed this one because it was so absurd.  This is along the lines of &quot;car uses no gas and generates electricity back into the power grid.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys will believe anything.  I never believed this one because it was so absurd.  This is along the lines of &#8220;car uses no gas and generates electricity back into the power grid.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 06:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>Lolll&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ll keep the 10-1000 f2 free lens (included) and remote weather control&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have to admit my list wasn&#039;t so creative :P
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lolll</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep the 10-1000 f2 free lens (included) and remote weather control</p>
<p>I have to admit my list wasn&#8217;t so creative <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1726</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1726</guid>
		<description>Thanks!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1724</guid>
		<description>Thanks - some people do understand the meaning of the word &quot;Rumor&quot; others don&#039;t and no one can change that. No matter what you do, you cannot escape critique. I can leave with it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; some people do understand the meaning of the word &#8220;Rumor&#8221; others don&#8217;t and no one can change that. No matter what you do, you cannot escape critique. I can leave with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1722</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1722</guid>
		<description>well, after reading the page:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don&#039;t believe it&#039;s completely impossible to have a surprise inside the D3/D700, that would give sense to the firmware&#039;s coding of 24MP&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(many people should learn to be more cautious before speaking or laughing about others. To criticize is always easier..) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The question is (assuming the sensor is more than just 12MP) if it could be possible to switch between 12 and 24MP of resolution with only a firmware update, and if that switch keeps the actual 12MP signal-to-noise ratio (when shooting 12MP images) or it would simply lower the resolution with 24MP&#039;s noise levels.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Whould be impressive to have the ability to shoot a 12MP image with 12MP-like noise level, and the option to shoot 24MP images (with its respective higher noise level), both toghether in the same camera, at the choice of the photographer...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, after reading the page:<br /><a href="http://www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm</a><br />I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s completely impossible to have a surprise inside the D3/D700, that would give sense to the firmware&#8217;s coding of 24MP</p>
<p>(many people should learn to be more cautious before speaking or laughing about others. To criticize is always easier..) </p>
<p>The question is (assuming the sensor is more than just 12MP) if it could be possible to switch between 12 and 24MP of resolution with only a firmware update, and if that switch keeps the actual 12MP signal-to-noise ratio (when shooting 12MP images) or it would simply lower the resolution with 24MP&#8217;s noise levels.</p>
<p>- Whould be impressive to have the ability to shoot a 12MP image with 12MP-like noise level, and the option to shoot 24MP images (with its respective higher noise level), both toghether in the same camera, at the choice of the photographer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>well, after reading the page:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don&#039;t believe it&#039;s completely impossible to have a surprise inside the D3/D700, that would give sense to the firmware&#039;s coding of 24MP&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The question is (assuming the sensor is more than just 12MP) if it could be possible to switch between 12 and 24MP of resolution with only a firmware update, and if that switch keeps the actual 12MP signal-to-noise ratio (when shooting 12MP images) or it would simply lower the resolution with 24MP&#039;s noise levels.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Whould be impressive to have the ability to shoot a 12MP image with 12MP-like noise level, and the option to shoot 24MP images (with its respective higher noise level), both toghether in the same camera, at the choice of the photographer...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, after reading the page:<br /><a href="http://www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm</a><br />I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s completely impossible to have a surprise inside the D3/D700, that would give sense to the firmware&#8217;s coding of 24MP</p>
<p>The question is (assuming the sensor is more than just 12MP) if it could be possible to switch between 12 and 24MP of resolution with only a firmware update, and if that switch keeps the actual 12MP signal-to-noise ratio (when shooting 12MP images) or it would simply lower the resolution with 24MP&#8217;s noise levels.</p>
<p>- Whould be impressive to have the ability to shoot a 12MP image with 12MP-like noise level, and the option to shoot 24MP images (with its respective higher noise level), both toghether in the same camera, at the choice of the photographer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-1720</link>
		<dc:creator>Amin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1720</guid>
		<description>Why all the criticism re: the admin?  This is a rumor site.  A rumor is something which isn&#039;t 100%.  Some are more likely, some less.  If the admin said this one was a sure thing, then I could understand the negative comments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I too maintain a rumor site.  Mine is a new site, and I won&#039;t use this space to promote it.  I will mention, though, that I recently Publish an anonymous tip that is looking like it was B.S.  So it goes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you don&#039;t like rumors, then don&#039;t go to a rumor site!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-Amin
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why all the criticism re: the admin?  This is a rumor site.  A rumor is something which isn&#8217;t 100%.  Some are more likely, some less.  If the admin said this one was a sure thing, then I could understand the negative comments.</p>
<p>I too maintain a rumor site.  Mine is a new site, and I won&#8217;t use this space to promote it.  I will mention, though, that I recently Publish an anonymous tip that is looking like it was B.S.  So it goes.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like rumors, then don&#8217;t go to a rumor site!</p>
<p>-Amin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leping</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>Leping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>Remember Nikon did exactly this binding down the actual sensor resolution for low noise game before with the D1 series:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&amp;message=4413078&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&amp;message=4413078&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;so that the rumor is not that outrageous at all.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember Nikon did exactly this binding down the actual sensor resolution for low noise game before with the D1 series:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.lonestardigital.com/techcorner.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&#038;message=4413078" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&#038;message=4413078</a></p>
<p>so that the rumor is not that outrageous at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>LOL
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1717</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1717</guid>
		<description>You should take that off!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should take that off!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikon nikon nikon</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>nikon nikon nikon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>It took you this long to figure that out?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took you this long to figure that out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1715</link>
		<dc:creator>AP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1715</guid>
		<description>I think this is wishful thinking.  when the 3G iphone was about to come out, there were a lot of rumors going around that the exiting 2G phones would be firmware upgradeable to 3G...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These companies want you to keep buying their products.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Seems unlikely.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is wishful thinking.  when the 3G iphone was about to come out, there were a lot of rumors going around that the exiting 2G phones would be firmware upgradeable to 3G&#8230;</p>
<p>These companies want you to keep buying their products.  </p>
<p>Seems unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leping</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>Leping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>1. Check out 16-9.net and see how wonderfully the recent Nikon lenses perform on the 21.1MP 1DsIII sensor.  Nothing is mussy all to the corners.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. The DX crop of a 24.4MP FX sensor is 24.4/(1.5*1.5)=10.84MP not 12MP.  High school math?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. Some one please pointing your microscope to an open D3/D700 sensor to checkout the microlens configuration and density to give us the definitive answer?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Downsize the A900 RAW file (with the ACR candidate Adobe released yesterday) to the 12.1MP D3 file size you will see the noise performance is identical if not better.  See posts in the dpreview Sony SLR forum.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Check out 16-9.net and see how wonderfully the recent Nikon lenses perform on the 21.1MP 1DsIII sensor.  Nothing is mussy all to the corners.</p>
<p>2. The DX crop of a 24.4MP FX sensor is 24.4/(1.5*1.5)=10.84MP not 12MP.  High school math?</p>
<p>3. Some one please pointing your microscope to an open D3/D700 sensor to checkout the microlens configuration and density to give us the definitive answer?</p>
<p>Downsize the A900 RAW file (with the ACR candidate Adobe released yesterday) to the 12.1MP D3 file size you will see the noise performance is identical if not better.  See posts in the dpreview Sony SLR forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-1713</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/09/17/big-busted.aspx#comment-1713</guid>
		<description>according to Thom Hogans the D3/D700 has a Nikon sensor:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bythom.com/currentdslr.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.bythom.com/currentdslr.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;but would be nice to have the exact specs, although I didn&#039;t find it
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>according to Thom Hogans the D3/D700 has a Nikon sensor:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bythom.com/currentdslr.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.bythom.com/currentdslr.htm</a></p>
<p>but would be nice to have the exact specs, although I didn&#8217;t find it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

