<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes, it could be a typo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3484</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx#comment-3484</guid>
		<description>The shops and re-sellers often get information about new products before the rest of us - remember Digital Depot and the D-700? I thought it&#039;s probably a typo, but there&#039;s just a chance that they&#039;ve put next month&#039;s &quot;NEW!&quot; tags on this month&#039;s price list. And it all adds to the fun, of course&lt;br /&gt;- JJ
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shops and re-sellers often get information about new products before the rest of us &#8211; remember Digital Depot and the D-700? I thought it&#8217;s probably a typo, but there&#8217;s just a chance that they&#8217;ve put next month&#8217;s &#8220;NEW!&#8221; tags on this month&#8217;s price list. And it all adds to the fun, of course<br />- JJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidthenikonuser</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3483</link>
		<dc:creator>davidthenikonuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx#comment-3483</guid>
		<description>In the past couple of years all new lenses have been G type. The last lens to have an aperture ring was the 50mm f/1.8D in 2002. So I really don&#039;t think Nikon is going to start putting the aperture ring back on. If people want a lens to use on the old manual cameras then they can by the old used lenses for them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I beet in a couple more years after Nikon updates all there primes to AF-S they will no longer put in-camera focus motors in any of there DSLR&#039;s.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past couple of years all new lenses have been G type. The last lens to have an aperture ring was the 50mm f/1.8D in 2002. So I really don&#8217;t think Nikon is going to start putting the aperture ring back on. If people want a lens to use on the old manual cameras then they can by the old used lenses for them.</p>
<p>I beet in a couple more years after Nikon updates all there primes to AF-S they will no longer put in-camera focus motors in any of there DSLR&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3482</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx#comment-3482</guid>
		<description>AF-D and AF-S are not mutually exclusive, you know... as the 300/4 AF-S, 17-35/2.8 AF-S and 28-70/2.8 AF-S show. I agree that it&#039;s likely a typo, though...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AF-D and AF-S are not mutually exclusive, you know&#8230; as the 300/4 AF-S, 17-35/2.8 AF-S and 28-70/2.8 AF-S show. I agree that it&#8217;s likely a typo, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx#comment-3481</guid>
		<description>SB-900 - 1 year old? You mean 1 1/2 months old - introduced on July 1st, 2008. Check!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SB-900 &#8211; 1 year old? You mean 1 1/2 months old &#8211; introduced on July 1st, 2008. Check!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3480</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx#comment-3480</guid>
		<description>Er, nope. The SB-900 was announced last July together with the D700, so it&#039;s still quite new :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, nope. The SB-900 was announced last July together with the D700, so it&#8217;s still quite new <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3479</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx#comment-3479</guid>
		<description>Ya that&#039;s a &quot;new&quot; sb-900 too. Thats about a year old now :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya that&#8217;s a &#8220;new&#8221; sb-900 too. Thats about a year old now <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: florian</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3478</link>
		<dc:creator>florian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx#comment-3478</guid>
		<description>Or it is just &quot;new&quot; on stock.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or it is just &#8220;new&#8221; on stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christian</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3477</link>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx#comment-3477</guid>
		<description>I think the two &quot;new&quot; are from the version before and they maybe belong to the pc-e 85 and the af-s 60, which maybe were new in the last list.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the two &#8220;new&#8221; are from the version before and they maybe belong to the pc-e 85 and the af-s 60, which maybe were new in the last list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3476</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx#comment-3476</guid>
		<description>the question is, which word is the typo?&lt;br /&gt;the &quot;new&quot; ?? or the &quot;AF&quot; ??&lt;br /&gt;both could be ;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the question is, which word is the typo?<br />the &#8220;new&#8221; ?? or the &#8220;AF&#8221; ??<br />both could be <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Saville Photography</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Saville Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>Nikon would be committing suicide by releasing more AF-D primes.  They have been trying to sell AF-D incompatible bodies for about 2 years now, and they have yet to release even ONE f/1.x lens with AF-S.  UN-ACCEPTABLE.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course I&#039;m confident that the upcoming (and they ARE coming) primes will indeed be AF-S G, and hopefully the pro versions will be ED / N etc...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;=Matt=
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon would be committing suicide by releasing more AF-D primes.  They have been trying to sell AF-D incompatible bodies for about 2 years now, and they have yet to release even ONE f/1.x lens with AF-S.  UN-ACCEPTABLE.</p>
<p>Of course I&#8217;m confident that the upcoming (and they ARE coming) primes will indeed be AF-S G, and hopefully the pro versions will be ED / N etc&#8230;</p>
<p>=Matt=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3474</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx#comment-3474</guid>
		<description>It could be that it&#039;s a an AF-S lens with an aperture ring, like the AF-S 17-35 f/2.8 lens.  This would allow backwards compatibility with older cameras if they plan on completely discontinuing the non AF-S primes they currently have in production.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be that it&#8217;s a an AF-S lens with an aperture ring, like the AF-S 17-35 f/2.8 lens.  This would allow backwards compatibility with older cameras if they plan on completely discontinuing the non AF-S primes they currently have in production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidthenikonuser</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-3473</link>
		<dc:creator>davidthenikonuser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/17/yes-it-could-be-a-typo.aspx#comment-3473</guid>
		<description>must be a typo. New lenses would be AF-S and G lenses.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>must be a typo. New lenses would be AF-S and G lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

