<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Nikon D90 picture (updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4077</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4077</guid>
		<description>Yes, I hope that too about a Cover for the Mic, wouldn&#039;t hurt, and could be really important, would make the camera much &quot;weather-proof&quot; (at least for water drops or tiny rain)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I also would appreciate VERY MUCH if the Video mode records audio in STEREO format instead of just Mono.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In that case that would need 2 mics, of course.. maybe in the other side, not shown here?  I hope !! :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I hope that too about a Cover for the Mic, wouldn&#8217;t hurt, and could be really important, would make the camera much &#8220;weather-proof&#8221; (at least for water drops or tiny rain)</p>
<p>I also would appreciate VERY MUCH if the Video mode records audio in STEREO format instead of just Mono.</p>
<p>In that case that would need 2 mics, of course.. maybe in the other side, not shown here?  I hope !! <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4076</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4076</guid>
		<description>Besides, the D90 is not supposed to be weather sealed so I don&#039;t see the problem.  As you say, if this pic is real, it&#039;s surely from a pre production model, perhaps the definitive design will be further improved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I must say though that even if the camera is not weather sealed, a small flap to cover the mic holes when not in use would not hurt at all. :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We&#039;ll see.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides, the D90 is not supposed to be weather sealed so I don&#8217;t see the problem.  As you say, if this pic is real, it&#8217;s surely from a pre production model, perhaps the definitive design will be further improved.</p>
<p>I must say though that even if the camera is not weather sealed, a small flap to cover the mic holes when not in use would not hurt at all. <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4075</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4075</guid>
		<description>looks real i really like the video mode and hope that the mic  can be used to set off the shutter
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks real i really like the video mode and hope that the mic  can be used to set off the shutter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4074</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4074</guid>
		<description>you know it is real because---its got the dust on it no one ever sees until they take a photo...and no one ever bothers to clean off and retake the picture  ;o)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know it is real because&#8212;its got the dust on it no one ever sees until they take a photo&#8230;and no one ever bothers to clean off and retake the picture  ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghargh</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4065</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghargh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4065</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a mechanic shutter, rather some electronic cut off device like in cell phones. I&#039;m not shure however.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a mechanic shutter, rather some electronic cut off device like in cell phones. I&#8217;m not shure however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sportymonk</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4064</link>
		<dc:creator>Sportymonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4064</guid>
		<description>A question more than a comment. I have a camcorder but have never thought about how it works in terms of the shutter and achieving 29 fps (IIRC). I was thinking (an admittedly dangerous thing) and got to thinking that if an SLR has to open and close the shutter at the rate of 29fps then it will open and close 104400 times for an hour&#039;s worth of shooting. IF the shutter is rated at 150,000, then the camera could be worn out post haste. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BUT does the shutter open and close on a camcorder. It it has a different mechanism, then does that mean the D90 has a completely new mechanism inside also? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;OR am I in the dark and all wet? Questions questions.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question more than a comment. I have a camcorder but have never thought about how it works in terms of the shutter and achieving 29 fps (IIRC). I was thinking (an admittedly dangerous thing) and got to thinking that if an SLR has to open and close the shutter at the rate of 29fps then it will open and close 104400 times for an hour&#8217;s worth of shooting. IF the shutter is rated at 150,000, then the camera could be worn out post haste. </p>
<p>BUT does the shutter open and close on a camcorder. It it has a different mechanism, then does that mean the D90 has a completely new mechanism inside also? </p>
<p>OR am I in the dark and all wet? Questions questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 76mm</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4063</link>
		<dc:creator>76mm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4063</guid>
		<description>You know... I just have this feeling that the D90 will become THE camera within the  Nikon line of modern cameras.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know&#8230; I just have this feeling that the D90 will become THE camera within the  Nikon line of modern cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mateo</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4062</link>
		<dc:creator>Mateo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4062</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m certain this picture is a fake.  It is a good fake, but a fake.  Basically just let your eyes trace the seam of the front panel and you&#039;ll start to &quot;see&quot; the paste job.  As someone else mentioned, the lense release button doesn&#039;t look right at all.  Notice the area just above the button and it clearly looks doctored as does the seam around the AF/M lever.  Speaking of the AF/M lever, look behind the lever and then immediately down. The lines don&#039;t line up!!  Lastly, look at the seam along the upper righ side of the front panel.  (This is right of the &quot;D90&quot; and slighly below).  Immediately next to the seam, notice how the reflection changes.  There is this small &quot;strip&quot; of surface that is inconsistant.  This alone is a dead give away how the surface of contours of the camera are not consistent.  You would have to believe that Nikon placed a serious surface crevis on this seam.  All in all, you can see it is a really cool FAKE.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m certain this picture is a fake.  It is a good fake, but a fake.  Basically just let your eyes trace the seam of the front panel and you&#8217;ll start to &#8220;see&#8221; the paste job.  As someone else mentioned, the lense release button doesn&#8217;t look right at all.  Notice the area just above the button and it clearly looks doctored as does the seam around the AF/M lever.  Speaking of the AF/M lever, look behind the lever and then immediately down. The lines don&#8217;t line up!!  Lastly, look at the seam along the upper righ side of the front panel.  (This is right of the &#8220;D90&#8243; and slighly below).  Immediately next to the seam, notice how the reflection changes.  There is this small &#8220;strip&#8221; of surface that is inconsistant.  This alone is a dead give away how the surface of contours of the camera are not consistent.  You would have to believe that Nikon placed a serious surface crevis on this seam.  All in all, you can see it is a really cool FAKE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4073</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4073</guid>
		<description>There was a D10 rumor a while ago, but I guess it was fake. Check the old posts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a D10 rumor a while ago, but I guess it was fake. Check the old posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4072</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4072</guid>
		<description>Looks pretty legit to me...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just some thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;- wouldn&#039;t it be smarter to name the D80&#039;s successor D10 instead of D90? Cause it would make no sense to name the D90&#039;s successor &quot;D100&quot;. Unless they plan to take the D10 road after the D90 is released...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- I think movie recording in a dSLR is completely and utterly ridiculous. Why would a D90 user (majorly pro-sumers) want to record mediocre video, when they probably have a camcorder already? Leave that to the P&amp;S market!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- GPS? Are you kidding me? Why pay more for a feature only 10% of users will use? C&#039;mon!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- kudos for the bracketing button :D
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks pretty legit to me&#8230;</p>
<p>Just some thoughts:<br />- wouldn&#8217;t it be smarter to name the D80&#8242;s successor D10 instead of D90? Cause it would make no sense to name the D90&#8242;s successor &#8220;D100&#8243;. Unless they plan to take the D10 road after the D90 is released&#8230;</p>
<p>- I think movie recording in a dSLR is completely and utterly ridiculous. Why would a D90 user (majorly pro-sumers) want to record mediocre video, when they probably have a camcorder already? Leave that to the P&#038;S market!</p>
<p>- GPS? Are you kidding me? Why pay more for a feature only 10% of users will use? C&#8217;mon!</p>
<p>- kudos for the bracketing button <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisky</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4071</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4071</guid>
		<description>How about primes first? (I hope...)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about primes first? (I hope&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charanischiu</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4070</link>
		<dc:creator>charanischiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4070</guid>
		<description>This is absolutely real picture of the new Nikon D90 because it has a separate socket for the GPS unit connection. Other Nikon D200,300,3 use the same socket for the remote control unit, if this socket is occupied by GPS unit, you can not use the remote control.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is absolutely real picture of the new Nikon D90 because it has a separate socket for the GPS unit connection. Other Nikon D200,300,3 use the same socket for the remote control unit, if this socket is occupied by GPS unit, you can not use the remote control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fansnikon</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4069</link>
		<dc:creator>fansnikon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4069</guid>
		<description>interesting,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://img135.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nikonn4tz1.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://img135.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nikonn4tz1.jpg&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting,<br /><a href="http://img135.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nikonn4tz1.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img135.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nikonn4tz1.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4068</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4068</guid>
		<description>Shows what I know about HD and flat screen TVs! Looks like the real deal to me, though
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shows what I know about HD and flat screen TVs! Looks like the real deal to me, though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4067</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4067</guid>
		<description>Shutter not used, it uses the live view feed.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shutter not used, it uses the live view feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goa</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4061</link>
		<dc:creator>Goa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 04:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4061</guid>
		<description>Serv wrote:&lt;br /&gt;&quot;has anyone thinked about another application besides video recording using a mic? it maybe, not probable, but maybe, be used for high speed photography, sound shutter&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The only thing that gets me about that theory is that why would a pro camera company that knows its stuff gets used outdoors all the time would put a mic in that risks taking some pretty nasty water damage....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serv wrote:<br />&#8220;has anyone thinked about another application besides video recording using a mic? it maybe, not probable, but maybe, be used for high speed photography, sound shutter&#8221;</p>
<p>The only thing that gets me about that theory is that why would a pro camera company that knows its stuff gets used outdoors all the time would put a mic in that risks taking some pretty nasty water damage&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quatschmacher</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4060</link>
		<dc:creator>quatschmacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 00:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4060</guid>
		<description>It probably is an IR shutter release (as opposed to cable). Thom&#039;s site says: &quot; On the front there&#039;s a microphone grill next to the INFRARED RECEIVER.&quot; (my emphasis)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It probably is an IR shutter release (as opposed to cable). Thom&#8217;s site says: &#8221; On the front there&#8217;s a microphone grill next to the INFRARED RECEIVER.&#8221; (my emphasis)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4059</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4059</guid>
		<description>Speaking as a graphic designer I don&#039;t see anything wrong with the typeface?  I flipped the D60 &quot;6&quot; and it seems to exactly match the &#039;9&#039; in the photo.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ben
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as a graphic designer I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with the typeface?  I flipped the D60 &#8220;6&#8243; and it seems to exactly match the &#8217;9&#8242; in the photo.  </p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4058</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4058</guid>
		<description>I am trying to get some more pictures.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to get some more pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisL</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx/comment-page-2/#comment-4057</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/07/first-nikon-d90-picture-updated.aspx#comment-4057</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the shutter release will be IR like on the D40/D60?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I agree its odd to move the socket though. It would also be awkward to have the door open with the GPS attached, in that location. I would have expected to see a captive rubber plug, like on the D700.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the shutter release will be IR like on the D40/D60?</p>
<p>I agree its odd to move the socket though. It would also be awkward to have the door open with the GPS attached, in that location. I would have expected to see a captive rubber plug, like on the D700.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

