<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Nikon p&amp;s revealed &#8211; S60, S610, S610c, S560, P6000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: gfx</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4123</link>
		<dc:creator>gfx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx#comment-4123</guid>
		<description>Weird slow lens f/2.7-5.9 My ancient canon G1 had a f/2-2.5 lens
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird slow lens f/2.7-5.9 My ancient canon G1 had a f/2-2.5 lens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rumpelhund</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4122</link>
		<dc:creator>rumpelhund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx#comment-4122</guid>
		<description>Please please nikon get us a D90 by adding NRW-Raw to a D80. I wouldn&#039;t need anything else in the whole wide world. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From Wikipedia:&lt;br /&gt;North Rhine-Westphalia (German: Nordrhein-Westfalen, usually shortened to NRW, official short form NW)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please please nikon get us a D90 by adding NRW-Raw to a D80. I wouldn&#8217;t need anything else in the whole wide world. </p>
<p>From Wikipedia:<br />North Rhine-Westphalia (German: Nordrhein-Westfalen, usually shortened to NRW, official short form NW)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stageshadow</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4121</link>
		<dc:creator>stageshadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx#comment-4121</guid>
		<description>I really like the design and the new features of the P6000, but&lt;br /&gt;even more Mega pixels on this tiny sensor and a lens with this sluggish apertures...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nikon, you can do better!&lt;br /&gt;Put more Performance in your P series and i will buy...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the design and the new features of the P6000, but<br />even more Mega pixels on this tiny sensor and a lens with this sluggish apertures&#8230;</p>
<p>Nikon, you can do better!<br />Put more Performance in your P series and i will buy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hofbrau</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4119</link>
		<dc:creator>Hofbrau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx#comment-4119</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally dissappointed! What about the D90??????????????? Any new info????
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally dissappointed! What about the D90??????????????? Any new info????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4118</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx#comment-4118</guid>
		<description>Yep, they were late this time...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, they were late this time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randini</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4117</link>
		<dc:creator>randini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx#comment-4117</guid>
		<description>And here&#039;s the announcement:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nikon.com/about/news/2008/0807_coolpixp6000_01.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nikon.com/about/news/2008/0807_coolpixp6000_01.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Specs:&lt;br /&gt;Effective pixels	13.5 million&lt;br /&gt;Image sensor	1/1.7-in. CCD; total pixels: approx. 13.93 million&lt;br /&gt;Lens	4x Zoom-NIKKOR; 6.0-24.0mm (35mm [135] format picture angle: 28-112mm); f/2.7-5.9; 9 elements in 7 groups; Digital zoom: up to 4x (35mm [135] format picture angle: 448mm)&lt;br /&gt;Focus range (from lens)	50cm (1 ft. 7.7 in.) to infinity (∞); Macro close-up mode: 2cm (0.8 in.) to infinity (∞)&lt;br /&gt;Storage media	Internal memory (approx. 48 MB), SD memory cards*1&lt;br /&gt;Image size (pixels)	4224 x 3168 (13M), 3264 x 2448 (8M), 2592 x 1944 (5M), 2048 x 1536 (3M), 1600 x 1200 (2M), 1280 x 960 (1M), 1024×768 (PC), 640 x 480 (TV), 4224 x 2816 (3：2), 4224 x 2376 (16:9), 3168 x 3168 (1:1)&lt;br /&gt;Vibration Reduction (VR)	Optical lens shift VR&lt;br /&gt;ISO sensitivity	ISO 64, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 2000, 3200*2, 6400*2, Auto (auto gain ISO 64-800), High ISO Sensitivity Auto (ISO 64-1600), Fixed Range Auto (ISO 64-100, 200, 400)&lt;br /&gt;Interface	Hi-Speed USB&lt;br /&gt;Power sources	Rechargeable Li-ion Battery EN-EL5 (supplied), AC Adapter EH-66 (supplied)&lt;br /&gt;Battery life	Approx. 260 shots with EN-EL5 battery&lt;br /&gt;Dimensions (W x H x D)	Approx. 107 x 65.5 x 42 mm (4.2 x 2.6 x 1.7 in.) excluding projections&lt;br /&gt;Weight	Approx. 240 g (8.5oz.) without battery and SD memory card&lt;br /&gt;Supplied accessories*3	Rechargeable Li-ion Battery EN-EL5, AC Adapter EH-66, USB Cable UC-E6, Audio Video Cable EG-CP14, Strap AN-CP18, Software Suite CD-ROM&lt;br /&gt;Optional accessories	Battery Charger MH-61, Wide-angle Converter WC-E76, Adapter Ring UR-E21, Speedlight SB-400, SB-600, SB-900
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here&#8217;s the announcement:<br /><a href="http://www.nikon.com/about/news/2008/0807_coolpixp6000_01.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nikon.com/about/news/2008/0807_coolpixp6000_01.htm</a></p>
<p>Specs:<br />Effective pixels	13.5 million<br />Image sensor	1/1.7-in. CCD; total pixels: approx. 13.93 million<br />Lens	4x Zoom-NIKKOR; 6.0-24.0mm (35mm [135] format picture angle: 28-112mm); f/2.7-5.9; 9 elements in 7 groups; Digital zoom: up to 4x (35mm [135] format picture angle: 448mm)<br />Focus range (from lens)	50cm (1 ft. 7.7 in.) to infinity (∞); Macro close-up mode: 2cm (0.8 in.) to infinity (∞)<br />Storage media	Internal memory (approx. 48 MB), SD memory cards*1<br />Image size (pixels)	4224 x 3168 (13M), 3264 x 2448 (8M), 2592 x 1944 (5M), 2048 x 1536 (3M), 1600 x 1200 (2M), 1280 x 960 (1M), 1024×768 (PC), 640 x 480 (TV), 4224 x 2816 (3：2), 4224 x 2376 (16:9), 3168 x 3168 (1:1)<br />Vibration Reduction (VR)	Optical lens shift VR<br />ISO sensitivity	ISO 64, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 2000, 3200*2, 6400*2, Auto (auto gain ISO 64-800), High ISO Sensitivity Auto (ISO 64-1600), Fixed Range Auto (ISO 64-100, 200, 400)<br />Interface	Hi-Speed USB<br />Power sources	Rechargeable Li-ion Battery EN-EL5 (supplied), AC Adapter EH-66 (supplied)<br />Battery life	Approx. 260 shots with EN-EL5 battery<br />Dimensions (W x H x D)	Approx. 107 x 65.5 x 42 mm (4.2 x 2.6 x 1.7 in.) excluding projections<br />Weight	Approx. 240 g (8.5oz.) without battery and SD memory card<br />Supplied accessories*3	Rechargeable Li-ion Battery EN-EL5, AC Adapter EH-66, USB Cable UC-E6, Audio Video Cable EG-CP14, Strap AN-CP18, Software Suite CD-ROM<br />Optional accessories	Battery Charger MH-61, Wide-angle Converter WC-E76, Adapter Ring UR-E21, Speedlight SB-400, SB-600, SB-900</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randini</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4116</link>
		<dc:creator>randini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx#comment-4116</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t know. If I had to guess, and assuming it&#039;s true, I&#039;d say that maybe Nikon sent out some sort of statement in time to catch the morning issue of the newspaper &amp; once the article was ready it got leaked prematurely. After all, there&#039;s supposed to be a official announcemnt of something 6am central European time (that&#039;s what, another 1/2 hour away - we&#039;ll know soon enough!!).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t know. If I had to guess, and assuming it&#8217;s true, I&#8217;d say that maybe Nikon sent out some sort of statement in time to catch the morning issue of the newspaper &#038; once the article was ready it got leaked prematurely. After all, there&#8217;s supposed to be a official announcemnt of something 6am central European time (that&#8217;s what, another 1/2 hour away &#8211; we&#8217;ll know soon enough!!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4115</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx#comment-4115</guid>
		<description>Now I can say these rumors are 100% acurate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I can say these rumors are 100% acurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4114</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx#comment-4114</guid>
		<description>im somewhat skeptical of this myself as DPReview hasn&#039;t posted anything nor has Nikonusa.com. honestly the touch screen is somewhat disturbing in my opinion. Nikon is a camera and lens manufacturer, and a touch screen requires different technology than nikon has in the past shown intrest in (also why im hesitant/skeptical of the &quot;video&quot; posibility on the D90). if these rumors turn out to be acurate, then it shows Nikon moving in a completely different direction than what they are set up to do, and that personally makes me worry!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im somewhat skeptical of this myself as DPReview hasn&#8217;t posted anything nor has Nikonusa.com. honestly the touch screen is somewhat disturbing in my opinion. Nikon is a camera and lens manufacturer, and a touch screen requires different technology than nikon has in the past shown intrest in (also why im hesitant/skeptical of the &#8220;video&#8221; posibility on the D90). if these rumors turn out to be acurate, then it shows Nikon moving in a completely different direction than what they are set up to do, and that personally makes me worry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4113</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx#comment-4113</guid>
		<description>So, how did they leak it without an official Nikon announcement?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, how did they leak it without an official Nikon announcement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randini</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4112</link>
		<dc:creator>randini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/08/06/new-nikon-ps-revealed-s60-s610-s610c-s560-p6000.aspx#comment-4112</guid>
		<description>NY Times also had an article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/07/technology/personaltech/07camera.html?ref=personaltech&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/07/technology/personaltech/07camera.html?ref=personaltech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;wsaw it posted over on dpreview: &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1007&amp;thread=28493104&amp;page=2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1007&amp;thread=28493104&amp;page=2&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NY Times also had an article <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/07/technology/personaltech/07camera.html?ref=personaltech" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/07/technology/personaltech/07camera.html?ref=personaltech</a></p>
<p>wsaw it posted over on dpreview: <a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1007&#038;thread=28493104&#038;page=2" rel="nofollow">http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1007&#038;thread=28493104&#038;page=2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

