<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report on new lenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/24/report-on-new-lenses.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/24/report-on-new-lenses.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/24/report-on-new-lenses.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4776</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/24/report-on-new-lenses.aspx#comment-4776</guid>
		<description>Nikon has no 35 f/1.4 only a 35 f/2. And seriously every copy of that lens I&#039;ve ever used (about 10) has been 100% solid &amp; sharp from edge to edge and has some of the BEST contrast and color transmission ability of any nikon lens.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon has no 35 f/1.4 only a 35 f/2. And seriously every copy of that lens I&#8217;ve ever used (about 10) has been 100% solid &#038; sharp from edge to edge and has some of the BEST contrast and color transmission ability of any nikon lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Sow</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/24/report-on-new-lenses.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4777</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Sow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/24/report-on-new-lenses.aspx#comment-4777</guid>
		<description>No, I know that, I&#039;m saying that if the new 35 is in fact an autofocus version of the old manual focus 35 1.4, that&#039;s what I would be asking why it took them so long to update that lens, not the current 35 f/2
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I know that, I&#8217;m saying that if the new 35 is in fact an autofocus version of the old manual focus 35 1.4, that&#8217;s what I would be asking why it took them so long to update that lens, not the current 35 f/2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Sow</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/24/report-on-new-lenses.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4775</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Sow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/24/report-on-new-lenses.aspx#comment-4775</guid>
		<description>I would hope this is coming, you would think that Nikon would want to pair up high performance glass with the D3/D700 bodies, besides I think that we have enough Nikon Kit lenses.  And if these lenses are coming, they don&#039;t need to have VR, just AFS and an ED element.  But I would have to ask, what took them so long to update the 35 1.4, shouldn&#039;t that lens have been updated like 10 years ago?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hope this is coming, you would think that Nikon would want to pair up high performance glass with the D3/D700 bodies, besides I think that we have enough Nikon Kit lenses.  And if these lenses are coming, they don&#8217;t need to have VR, just AFS and an ED element.  But I would have to ask, what took them so long to update the 35 1.4, shouldn&#8217;t that lens have been updated like 10 years ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/24/report-on-new-lenses.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-4774</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/24/report-on-new-lenses.aspx#comment-4774</guid>
		<description>You have to ask, &quot;what&#039;s in it for Nikon?&quot; &lt;br /&gt;I don&#039;t see them selling these in the sort of volumes that they ship 18-55 zooms, nor to that many entry-level dSLR owners, so it makes more sense as a high-end product. Which implies 50mm/f1.2, 85mm/f1.4 . . . woohoo!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That said, I&#039;ve been wrong plenty of times before
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to ask, &#8220;what&#8217;s in it for Nikon?&#8221; <br />I don&#8217;t see them selling these in the sort of volumes that they ship 18-55 zooms, nor to that many entry-level dSLR owners, so it makes more sense as a high-end product. Which implies 50mm/f1.2, 85mm/f1.4 . . . woohoo!</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;ve been wrong plenty of times before</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

