<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D90 specs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/17/nikon-d90-specs.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/17/nikon-d90-specs.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/17/nikon-d90-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5112</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/17/nikon-d90-specs.aspx#comment-5112</guid>
		<description>I have found that the blown highlight problem goes away under center-weighted metering.  In fact, I use center-weighted metering %99 of the the time, and *never* matrix metering.  I never really understand the point of it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jamie
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found that the blown highlight problem goes away under center-weighted metering.  In fact, I use center-weighted metering %99 of the the time, and *never* matrix metering.  I never really understand the point of it.</p>
<p>Jamie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/17/nikon-d90-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5111</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/17/nikon-d90-specs.aspx#comment-5111</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;less noise sounds nice. but again that shitty matrix metering? C&#039;mon, Nikon.... I don&#039;t wanna watch the highlights all the time like on my D80...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And I&#039;m not sure what to expect from the 18-105 lens&#039;  image quality... kit quality and then such a long range?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this. </p>
<p>less noise sounds nice. but again that shitty matrix metering? C&#8217;mon, Nikon&#8230;. I don&#8217;t wanna watch the highlights all the time like on my D80&#8230;</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not sure what to expect from the 18-105 lens&#8217;  image quality&#8230; kit quality and then such a long range?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobJ</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/17/nikon-d90-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5110</link>
		<dc:creator>RobJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 04:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/17/nikon-d90-specs.aspx#comment-5110</guid>
		<description>Agree 100%.  If it has the same sensor as the D300, it should have the same ISO settings.  That means 200-3200, not 100-1600.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree 100%.  If it has the same sensor as the D300, it should have the same ISO settings.  That means 200-3200, not 100-1600.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/17/nikon-d90-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5109</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/17/nikon-d90-specs.aspx#comment-5109</guid>
		<description>how to make a good looking fake: post what everyone expects.&lt;br /&gt;a smaller D300, like the D80 was from the D200.&lt;br /&gt;but there is a thing, if it uses the same sensor as the D300 (as it have the same capabilities), why the iso settings are different?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how to make a good looking fake: post what everyone expects.<br />a smaller D300, like the D80 was from the D200.<br />but there is a thing, if it uses the same sensor as the D300 (as it have the same capabilities), why the iso settings are different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hades</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/17/nikon-d90-specs.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5108</link>
		<dc:creator>hades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/17/nikon-d90-specs.aspx#comment-5108</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t even bother!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t even bother!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

