<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fake pictures of 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/10/fake-pictures-of-70-200mm-f28-vrii-lens.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/10/fake-pictures-of-70-200mm-f28-vrii-lens.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: DAC</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/10/fake-pictures-of-70-200mm-f28-vrii-lens.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5451</link>
		<dc:creator>DAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/10/fake-pictures-of-70-200mm-f28-vrii-lens.aspx#comment-5451</guid>
		<description>A replacement nikon professional lens for Full frame sensor DSLR. D3 or D700 at this moment. here is the specification:&lt;br /&gt;FAT version VS Slim version(old).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1) VRII 4 stops Vs VR 2-3 stops.&lt;br /&gt;2) Fat design to correct Vignetting for D3 and D700&lt;br /&gt;3) 1350g VS 1470g&lt;br /&gt;4) Shorter - 19.3cm VS 21.5cm&lt;br /&gt;5) 6ED glass VS 5ED glass&lt;br /&gt;6) Handling more balance and ergonomic to hold.&lt;br /&gt;7) None - no distortion&lt;br /&gt;8) Price $1599 VS $1650. Cheaper than the existing??? why??&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;this fake lens sure very good hahaha
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A replacement nikon professional lens for Full frame sensor DSLR. D3 or D700 at this moment. here is the specification:<br />FAT version VS Slim version(old).</p>
<p>1) VRII 4 stops Vs VR 2-3 stops.<br />2) Fat design to correct Vignetting for D3 and D700<br />3) 1350g VS 1470g<br />4) Shorter &#8211; 19.3cm VS 21.5cm<br />5) 6ED glass VS 5ED glass<br />6) Handling more balance and ergonomic to hold.<br />7) None &#8211; no distortion<br /> <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> Price $1599 VS $1650. Cheaper than the existing??? why??</p>
<p>this fake lens sure very good hahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlielima</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/10/fake-pictures-of-70-200mm-f28-vrii-lens.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5450</link>
		<dc:creator>charlielima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/10/fake-pictures-of-70-200mm-f28-vrii-lens.aspx#comment-5450</guid>
		<description>Hi folks,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;my prediction concerning a successor to the AF-S VR 70-200 2,8: Next Photokina.&lt;br /&gt;Why: All its predecessors had a 5-year-life cycle. And the current version was released in 2003.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What do You think: Will the vignetting-issue be the only change on this lense (besides design)?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-charlielima
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi folks,</p>
<p>my prediction concerning a successor to the AF-S VR 70-200 2,8: Next Photokina.<br />Why: All its predecessors had a 5-year-life cycle. And the current version was released in 2003.</p>
<p>What do You think: Will the vignetting-issue be the only change on this lense (besides design)?</p>
<p>-charlielima</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/10/fake-pictures-of-70-200mm-f28-vrii-lens.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5449</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/10/fake-pictures-of-70-200mm-f28-vrii-lens.aspx#comment-5449</guid>
		<description>For now the rumors point for release @ Photokina in September.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For now the rumors point for release @ Photokina in September.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gragland</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/10/fake-pictures-of-70-200mm-f28-vrii-lens.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5448</link>
		<dc:creator>gragland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/10/fake-pictures-of-70-200mm-f28-vrii-lens.aspx#comment-5448</guid>
		<description>if they do come out with a new 70-200 f/ 2.8, will they offer it in the white/grey?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When do you think a new version will be released?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if they do come out with a new 70-200 f/ 2.8, will they offer it in the white/grey?</p>
<p>When do you think a new version will be released?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/10/fake-pictures-of-70-200mm-f28-vrii-lens.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5447</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 21:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/10/fake-pictures-of-70-200mm-f28-vrii-lens.aspx#comment-5447</guid>
		<description>Even if someone were trying to pass this as real, the glaring ommission is a &quot;N&quot; for the Nano coating all new pro-calibre Nikon lenses are getting.  Also, it&#039;s common knowledge what VR and VR II is, so it would be redundant on the second verstion to actually label &quot;Vibration Reduction&quot; under VR II.  The shape looks like modified Canon lens!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if someone were trying to pass this as real, the glaring ommission is a &#8220;N&#8221; for the Nano coating all new pro-calibre Nikon lenses are getting.  Also, it&#8217;s common knowledge what VR and VR II is, so it would be redundant on the second verstion to actually label &#8220;Vibration Reduction&#8221; under VR II.  The shape looks like modified Canon lens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

