<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D800 again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/03/nikon-d800-again.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/03/nikon-d800-again.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 01:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/03/nikon-d800-again.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5616</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/03/nikon-d800-again.aspx#comment-5616</guid>
		<description>D800 is a fake. Great video, great soundtrack. But I am sure even Nikon can spell &#039;Tripple&#039; and &#039;Doubble&#039; correctly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D800 is a fake. Great video, great soundtrack. But I am sure even Nikon can spell &#8216;Tripple&#8217; and &#8216;Doubble&#8217; correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/03/nikon-d800-again.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5615</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/03/nikon-d800-again.aspx#comment-5615</guid>
		<description>Once again, the specifications images on the flickr page have the &quot;doubble&quot; typo. Stupid hoax is stupid.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, the specifications images on the flickr page have the &#8220;doubble&#8221; typo. Stupid hoax is stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/03/nikon-d800-again.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5614</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/03/nikon-d800-again.aspx#comment-5614</guid>
		<description>I will call this rumor &quot;busted&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will call this rumor &#8220;busted&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/03/nikon-d800-again.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5613</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/03/nikon-d800-again.aspx#comment-5613</guid>
		<description>The &quot;crystal ball&quot; is actually the new prime lens, the 50mm F0.4
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;crystal ball&#8221; is actually the new prime lens, the 50mm F0.4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/07/03/nikon-d800-again.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-5612</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/07/03/nikon-d800-again.aspx#comment-5612</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s fake, the &quot;8&quot; in 800 is actually the contiguous part of the &quot;3&quot; on the D300 strap. If you look at anything branded with the &quot;300&quot; you can see there is a continuos backbone to the 3 and then two little extensions off of the tips of the 3. This photchopper simply cut off the little extensions and mirrored the main part of the 3 to make an 8. Not to mention the area around the D800 branding on the camera itself is a pixely mess. I think it&#039;s safe to say this one is busted and of course that some people have absolutely way too much time on their hands.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fake, the &#8220;8&#8243; in 800 is actually the contiguous part of the &#8220;3&#8243; on the D300 strap. If you look at anything branded with the &#8220;300&#8243; you can see there is a continuos backbone to the 3 and then two little extensions off of the tips of the 3. This photchopper simply cut off the little extensions and mirrored the main part of the 3 to make an 8. Not to mention the area around the D800 branding on the camera itself is a pixely mess. I think it&#8217;s safe to say this one is busted and of course that some people have absolutely way too much time on their hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

