Comments on: Another Nikon D700 picture http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx/ where there’s smoke there’s fire Thu, 24 May 2012 00:46:02 +0000 hourly 1 By: Mike http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6428 Mike Sat, 28 Jun 2008 04:46:02 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx#comment-6428 Thats a d200 foo, you noobs have to look a little bit closer, lol. Thats a d200 foo, you noobs have to look a little bit closer, lol.

]]> By: Ryan http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6427 Ryan Thu, 26 Jun 2008 05:44:35 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx#comment-6427 I don't think anyone is saying the camera is fake, they're just saying this photo is fake.<br /><br />The only plausibly legit photos were the original advertising photos taken with a cell phone. This one above is fake. I don’t think anyone is saying the camera is fake, they’re just saying this photo is fake.

The only plausibly legit photos were the original advertising photos taken with a cell phone. This one above is fake.

]]> By: orion84 http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6426 orion84 Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:23:38 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx#comment-6426 According to the Exif data it is shot with an Canon PowerShot SD700 IS (Ixus 800 IS, for us Europeans). Which is not the most recent camera, but even that can deliver way better quality images than this. Apart from all the other signs that have already been mentioned, this even more makes me say this is fake. Seems the crappy quality is there only for covering op traces of PhotoShop editing. According to the Exif data it is shot with an Canon PowerShot SD700 IS (Ixus 800 IS, for us Europeans). Which is not the most recent camera, but even that can deliver way better quality images than this. Apart from all the other signs that have already been mentioned, this even more makes me say this is fake. Seems the crappy quality is there only for covering op traces of PhotoShop editing.

]]> By: Dan http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6425 Dan Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:12:50 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx#comment-6425 people is stupid for sure.<br /><br />we have tom's predictions, spy pictures, camera websites with pre-sale D700 and people still calling FAKE?<br /><br />it's REAL!!! people is stupid for sure.

we have tom’s predictions, spy pictures, camera websites with pre-sale D700 and people still calling FAKE?

it’s REAL!!!

]]> By: fotomik http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6423 fotomik Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:12:20 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx#comment-6423 Hmm. That VF DOES look like the real thing should look like, on the baackside that is. I was hoping for a D3-style VF-covering, but that would kill the chance for a built-in flash. <br /><br />As to Mozart's comment, I just realized that our head of staff took a day off today... I wonder where went? Hmm. That VF DOES look like the real thing should look like, on the baackside that is. I was hoping for a D3-style VF-covering, but that would kill the chance for a built-in flash.

As to Mozart’s comment, I just realized that our head of staff took a day off today… I wonder where went?

]]> By: Mozart http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6422 Mozart Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:09:12 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx#comment-6422 Hi guys!<br /><br />I know that the sales offices personal for Nikon in Sweden were called into the main Nikon office today to get product updates information from Nikon head quarters. It is unknown what kind of product updates this is about but I think we will know more in the comming days if this includes any new SLRs. Hi guys!

I know that the sales offices personal for Nikon in Sweden were called into the main Nikon office today to get product updates information from Nikon head quarters. It is unknown what kind of product updates this is about but I think we will know more in the comming days if this includes any new SLRs.

]]> By: freddyc http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6421 freddyc Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:11:13 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx#comment-6421 These really are getting worse. All you "Real" voters need to look a bit closer. And all you fakers you really must try harder - changing the 3 to a 7 and sticking a couple of blobs on the side just isn't good enough - where are all you PS artists, come on show us what you can do and keep us entertained until some real pictures are out there!! These really are getting worse. All you “Real” voters need to look a bit closer. And all you fakers you really must try harder – changing the 3 to a 7 and sticking a couple of blobs on the side just isn’t good enough – where are all you PS artists, come on show us what you can do and keep us entertained until some real pictures are out there!!

]]> By: ABMann http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6424 ABMann Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:34:03 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx#comment-6424 They didn't do a very good job cleaning up the 700 in the strap. I can see blotches and blurry edges. They didn’t do a very good job cleaning up the 700 in the strap. I can see blotches and blurry edges.

]]> By: Renato Pedrosa http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6420 Renato Pedrosa Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:11:19 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx#comment-6420 7 on logo should be this one:<br /><br /><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3184/2612773693_9ccc1e1cde_o.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3184/2612773693_9ccc1e1cde_o.jpg</a><br /><br />(Called attention to by Thomas Comerford at DPr) 7 on logo should be this one:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3184/2612773693_9ccc1e1cde_o.jpg

(Called attention to by Thomas Comerford at DPr)

]]> By: Renato Pedrosa http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6419 Renato Pedrosa Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:05:39 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/25/another-nikon-d700-picture.aspx#comment-6419 Looks fake. The whole right side has signs of PS, top too. At least now it's a prime FF lens (105mm). Looks fake. The whole right side has signs of PS, top too. At least now it’s a prime FF lens (105mm).

]]>