<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plausible prediction of Nikon announcements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:35:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6807</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6807</guid>
		<description>Here is a screenshot:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrdat/2614024654/&quot;  title=&quot;Nikkor PC-E by MrDAT, on Flickr&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means that the D700 is probably real!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a screenshot:<br /><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrdat/2614024654/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrdat/2614024654/</a>&#8221;  title=&#8221;Nikkor PC-E by MrDAT, on Flickr&#8221;></p>
<p>This means that the D700 is probably real!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFD</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6806</link>
		<dc:creator>JFD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6806</guid>
		<description>Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nikon.ch&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.nikon.ch&lt;/a&gt; and wait for the banner to reveal the Nikkor new PC lenses... good stuff!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out <a href="http://www.nikon.ch" rel="nofollow">http://www.nikon.ch</a> and wait for the banner to reveal the Nikkor new PC lenses&#8230; good stuff!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6805</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6805</guid>
		<description>We will see next week...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will see next week&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commendatori</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6804</link>
		<dc:creator>Commendatori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6804</guid>
		<description>Nikon won&#039;t announce a &quot;D700&quot;. That doesn&#039;t make any sense. The D300 just came out and they have no reason to compete with the D3. In fact, why would anyone buy a D3 is there&#039;s a smaller, lighter, cheaper version, with exactly the same resolution? Besides, when have they ever jumped names--from a D300 to a D700? If it happens...great, I&#039;ll be first in line, but I think that&#039;s just silly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon won&#8217;t announce a &#8220;D700&#8243;. That doesn&#8217;t make any sense. The D300 just came out and they have no reason to compete with the D3. In fact, why would anyone buy a D3 is there&#8217;s a smaller, lighter, cheaper version, with exactly the same resolution? Besides, when have they ever jumped names&#8211;from a D300 to a D700? If it happens&#8230;great, I&#8217;ll be first in line, but I think that&#8217;s just silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6803</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6803</guid>
		<description>But they won&#039;t be available for the Olympics anyway.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they won&#8217;t be available for the Olympics anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnmh</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6802</link>
		<dc:creator>johnmh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6802</guid>
		<description>What happened to the revised 70-200 VR and 80-400  AF-S VR long lenses supposed to be coming out before the Olympics?  Made sense.......
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the revised 70-200 VR and 80-400  AF-S VR long lenses supposed to be coming out before the Olympics?  Made sense&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6801</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6801</guid>
		<description>I cannot really clarify that - DSLgossip reported it. I am a bit confused too.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot really clarify that &#8211; DSLgossip reported it. I am a bit confused too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haruki</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6800</link>
		<dc:creator>Haruki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6800</guid>
		<description>But the PC-E 45 and PC-E 85 were announced in january, that s nothing new:&lt;br /&gt;Nikon UK is also pleased to share important news about two more lenses to expand and strengthen our PC NIKKOR lens lineup. The new PC-E NIKKOR 45mm f/2.8D ED and PC-E Micro NIKKOR 85mm f/2.8D will be exhibited at the PMA 2008 International Convention and Trade Show in Las Vegas, USA from January 31 to February 2, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;dpreview in january
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the PC-E 45 and PC-E 85 were announced in january, that s nothing new:<br />Nikon UK is also pleased to share important news about two more lenses to expand and strengthen our PC NIKKOR lens lineup. The new PC-E NIKKOR 45mm f/2.8D ED and PC-E Micro NIKKOR 85mm f/2.8D will be exhibited at the PMA 2008 International Convention and Trade Show in Las Vegas, USA from January 31 to February 2, 2008.</p>
<p>dpreview in january</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6799</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6799</guid>
		<description>Currently Nikon has:&lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;br style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt;PC-E NIKKOR 24mm f/3.5D ED&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt;PC Micro-NIKKOR 85mm f/2.8D&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;br style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt;In the post DSLRGossip are talking about:&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;br style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt;PC-E ED 45mm f/2.8D&lt;br style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt;PC-E Micro ED 85mm f/2.8D&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;br style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt;I am also surprised (and unhappy) that they will not give us some more AF-S primes. Do we need so many PC lenses? Parts of this rumor comes from the leaked D700 catalog - there were pictures of 2 lenses (http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/more-nikon-d700-pictures-plus-do-i-see-some-new-lenses.aspx):&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt;PC-E Nikkor 24 mm f/3.5&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt;PC-E Micro Nikkor 45 mm f/2.8&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style=&quot;outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; &quot;&gt;So it could just be a typo from DSLGossip. It is hard for me to believe that  they will release another 2 PC lenses, but why would they put them in the D700 catalog?&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently Nikon has:
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "> <br style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "/> </div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; ">
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; ">PC-E NIKKOR 24mm f/3.5D ED</div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; ">PC Micro-NIKKOR 85mm f/2.8D</div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "> <br style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "/> </div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; ">In the post DSLRGossip are talking about:</div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "> <br style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "/> </div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; ">PC-E ED 45mm f/2.8D<br style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "/> </div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; ">
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; ">PC-E Micro ED 85mm f/2.8D</div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "> <br style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "/> </div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; ">I am also surprised (and unhappy) that they will not give us some more AF-S primes. Do we need so many PC lenses? Parts of this rumor comes from the leaked D700 catalog &#8211; there were pictures of 2 lenses (<a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/more-nikon-d700-pictures-plus-do-i-see-some-new-lenses.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/more-nikon-d700-pictures-plus-do-i-see-some-new-lenses.aspx</a>):</div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "> </div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; ">PC-E Nikkor 24 mm f/3.5</div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; ">PC-E Micro Nikkor 45 mm f/2.8</div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "> </div>
<div style="outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; ">So it could just be a typo from DSLGossip. It is hard for me to believe that  they will release another 2 PC lenses, but why would they put them in the D700 catalog?</div>
</p></div>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6798</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6798</guid>
		<description>I was! That&#039;s why I am a bit disappointed. See my previous posts under lenses. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was! That&#8217;s why I am a bit disappointed. See my previous posts under lenses. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theo</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6797</link>
		<dc:creator>Theo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6797</guid>
		<description>Dear Nikon top management, please make the D90 to materialize soon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Nikon top management, please make the D90 to materialize soon.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haruki</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6796</link>
		<dc:creator>haruki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6796</guid>
		<description>But are the PC-E lenses announcements? Both were announct weeks ago, so thats no rumor not even a news.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But are the PC-E lenses announcements? Both were announct weeks ago, so thats no rumor not even a news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6795</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6795</guid>
		<description>that is, other than the discontinuation of the 50mm AF with likely another FX coming out, which would leave the &quot;fast normal&quot; focal length (on FX) to only third parties (e.g. sigma) and second hand stores.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is, other than the discontinuation of the 50mm AF with likely another FX coming out, which would leave the &#8220;fast normal&#8221; focal length (on FX) to only third parties (e.g. sigma) and second hand stores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6794</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6794</guid>
		<description>Is no one anticipating a new 50mm AF-S? Is that just wishful thinking at this point with no, even halfway reliable, info on the validity of its existence?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is no one anticipating a new 50mm AF-S? Is that just wishful thinking at this point with no, even halfway reliable, info on the validity of its existence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stylus</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6793</link>
		<dc:creator>Stylus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6793</guid>
		<description>The smartest move for Nikon is to update the D80 NOW.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://img208.imageshack.us/my.php?image=timelineyh5.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://img208.imageshack.us/my.php?image=timelineyh5.jpg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;D700 can wait until Photokina
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The smartest move for Nikon is to update the D80 NOW.</p>
<p><a href="http://img208.imageshack.us/my.php?image=timelineyh5.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img208.imageshack.us/my.php?image=timelineyh5.jpg</a></p>
<p>D700 can wait until Photokina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6792</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/20/plausible-prediction-of-nikon-announcements.aspx#comment-6792</guid>
		<description>D300 price has dropped by around $40 to $50 this week, may be there is a reason for this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Example Price:&lt;br /&gt;JR was selling for $1699 last week, now it is $1649. I have seen similar drops at several other websites as well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D300 price has dropped by around $40 to $50 this week, may be there is a reason for this.</p>
<p>Example Price:<br />JR was selling for $1699 last week, now it is $1649. I have seen similar drops at several other websites as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

