<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D700 specs revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:40:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: sunmm</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8823</link>
		<dc:creator>sunmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 05:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-8823</guid>
		<description>magic~~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>magic~~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abbilder</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6846</link>
		<dc:creator>abbilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6846</guid>
		<description>I am not convinced by this D700.&lt;br /&gt;The specifications are too much D3, important issues like fps are missing. This D700 would kill the  D3 in addition with a D3x. Nikon is  not so fast with  new cameras.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I much more believe in a D80 update and  the D3x.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not convinced by this D700.<br />The specifications are too much D3, important issues like fps are missing. This D700 would kill the  D3 in addition with a D3x. Nikon is  not so fast with  new cameras.</p>
<p>I much more believe in a D80 update and  the D3x.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Saville Photography</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6845</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Saville Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6845</guid>
		<description>There is so much I could say about this.  So much to debate.  (in a friendly manner, I mean.)  Gotta get to sleep though.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All I&#039;m gonna say is that, whether or not these specs ARE a true leak, this really IS just about the camera we OUGHT to see sooner or later.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And NO, it will not kill the D3, it&#039;ll probably be &quot;only&quot; 5-6 FPS and have a handful of other limitations...  (no dual card slots, lower rated shutter life, etc.)  Sure, a good number of the people who REALLY didn&#039;t NEED the D3 in the first place are going to be upset that they bought it.  But that is inevitable with ANY &quot;affordable alternative&quot; wouldn&#039;t you think?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;=Matt=
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is so much I could say about this.  So much to debate.  (in a friendly manner, I mean.)  Gotta get to sleep though.</p>
<p>All I&#8217;m gonna say is that, whether or not these specs ARE a true leak, this really IS just about the camera we OUGHT to see sooner or later.</p>
<p>And NO, it will not kill the D3, it&#8217;ll probably be &#8220;only&#8221; 5-6 FPS and have a handful of other limitations&#8230;  (no dual card slots, lower rated shutter life, etc.)  Sure, a good number of the people who REALLY didn&#8217;t NEED the D3 in the first place are going to be upset that they bought it.  But that is inevitable with ANY &#8220;affordable alternative&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>=Matt=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo-1</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6844</link>
		<dc:creator>jo-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6844</guid>
		<description>well - this looks absolutely possible to me. And it would make absolutely sens in every aspect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If Nikon is prepping a new 24 MPixel sensor (maybe together with Sony) then the &quot;old&quot; 12 MPixel sensor has to be &#039;downgraded&#039; to the prosumer line. A D3 might have it&#039;s niche for pure sports photographers and might stay for a while in the market. A D3x instead must have an advantage over a prosumer line. I was always doubting the rumors that Nikon would bring out a D10 with FF and 16 MPixel - what would have been the result for the actual FF sensor?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No - this rumor makes absolutely sense and I go even one step further.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A D3x + a D700 + a D3 would make a family concept and in two years from now a D800 would ideally fit with 24 MPixels as well. Sensor evolution is a costly thing to say and Nikon is surely quoting their R&amp;D budget carefully. The next evolution will be higher ISO for a 24 MPixel sensor and maybe even 30 MPixel as soon as they have the technology at hand (or Sony has it)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A D700 is nothing more than a D3 and therefore it is surely no camera for me because i could have bought a 5D long time ago - let&#039;s cross the fingers and for the D3x below 6 k USD and 24 MPixel - this will be the &#039;golden standard&#039; for all digital photographers. A D700 would be like a Porsche Cayman while there is still the 911 around ;-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well &#8211; this looks absolutely possible to me. And it would make absolutely sens in every aspect.</p>
<p>If Nikon is prepping a new 24 MPixel sensor (maybe together with Sony) then the &#8220;old&#8221; 12 MPixel sensor has to be &#8216;downgraded&#8217; to the prosumer line. A D3 might have it&#8217;s niche for pure sports photographers and might stay for a while in the market. A D3x instead must have an advantage over a prosumer line. I was always doubting the rumors that Nikon would bring out a D10 with FF and 16 MPixel &#8211; what would have been the result for the actual FF sensor?</p>
<p>No &#8211; this rumor makes absolutely sense and I go even one step further.</p>
<p>A D3x + a D700 + a D3 would make a family concept and in two years from now a D800 would ideally fit with 24 MPixels as well. Sensor evolution is a costly thing to say and Nikon is surely quoting their R&#038;D budget carefully. The next evolution will be higher ISO for a 24 MPixel sensor and maybe even 30 MPixel as soon as they have the technology at hand (or Sony has it)</p>
<p>A D700 is nothing more than a D3 and therefore it is surely no camera for me because i could have bought a 5D long time ago &#8211; let&#8217;s cross the fingers and for the D3x below 6 k USD and 24 MPixel &#8211; this will be the &#8216;golden standard&#8217; for all digital photographers. A D700 would be like a Porsche Cayman while there is still the 911 around <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nounours</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6843</link>
		<dc:creator>Nounours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6843</guid>
		<description>Canon 5D&#039;s MSRP was $3300 when it came out.&lt;br /&gt;The 5DMarkII is rumored at $3500 (of course, it&#039;s just rumors).&lt;br /&gt;Nikon&#039;s D3 is already available at $4200 after just a few months.&lt;br /&gt;It&#039;s obvious that the D700 wouldn&#039;t stay at $3000 after the initial hype.&lt;br /&gt;My bet is that it would probably go down around $2400-$2500 after a few months, which would put it at around $500 more than he 5D.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon 5D&#8217;s MSRP was $3300 when it came out.<br />The 5DMarkII is rumored at $3500 (of course, it&#8217;s just rumors).<br />Nikon&#8217;s D3 is already available at $4200 after just a few months.<br />It&#8217;s obvious that the D700 wouldn&#8217;t stay at $3000 after the initial hype.<br />My bet is that it would probably go down around $2400-$2500 after a few months, which would put it at around $500 more than he 5D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EKA</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6850</link>
		<dc:creator>EKA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6850</guid>
		<description>If the rumours true, i´m still curious about the fps performance. The specs on this side says nothing about how many frames per second the camera performs. A very important question to be answered to us sports photographers.&lt;br /&gt;Any rumours about fps performance of D700
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the rumours true, i´m still curious about the fps performance. The specs on this side says nothing about how many frames per second the camera performs. A very important question to be answered to us sports photographers.<br />Any rumours about fps performance of D700</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6849</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6849</guid>
		<description>This is tough one to guess. My personal opinion - no.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is tough one to guess. My personal opinion &#8211; no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6848</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6848</guid>
		<description>Is it going to have an onboard flash?  Some of the photos you have seem to have the line of one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it going to have an onboard flash?  Some of the photos you have seem to have the line of one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6847</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 06:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6847</guid>
		<description>Well, I hope this rumour is true.   We need both Sony and Nikon to bring out more full frame cameras to give Canon a competitive prod.    That 5D is a great camera, but without modern features like live view and auto-sensor cleaning its looking long in the tooth.   With Nikon, Canon and Sony predicted to reveal FX bodies in the next year or so prices should drop, and quality should rise.   Personally I am too broke at present to buy another camera, but I&#039;m glad of that.   This years affordable models are going to be seriously outclassed by the next generation FX.   A great time to be a digital photographer!   DX sucks, long live FX.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I hope this rumour is true.   We need both Sony and Nikon to bring out more full frame cameras to give Canon a competitive prod.    That 5D is a great camera, but without modern features like live view and auto-sensor cleaning its looking long in the tooth.   With Nikon, Canon and Sony predicted to reveal FX bodies in the next year or so prices should drop, and quality should rise.   Personally I am too broke at present to buy another camera, but I&#8217;m glad of that.   This years affordable models are going to be seriously outclassed by the next generation FX.   A great time to be a digital photographer!   DX sucks, long live FX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pint</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6842</link>
		<dc:creator>pint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6842</guid>
		<description>the 5D is $1100 less RIGHT NOW because they are clearing it out for whatever they are goign to replace it with.  Which will likely sell for around $3k.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 5D is $1100 less RIGHT NOW because they are clearing it out for whatever they are goign to replace it with.  Which will likely sell for around $3k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveNYC</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6841</link>
		<dc:creator>daveNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6841</guid>
		<description>If this is going to be a full-frame prosumer model, then its closest competition will be the 5D, which is about $1100 less.  If this is for real, I don&#039;t understand what their plan is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is going to be a full-frame prosumer model, then its closest competition will be the 5D, which is about $1100 less.  If this is for real, I don&#8217;t understand what their plan is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo Rivas</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6840</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo Rivas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6840</guid>
		<description>hum..... FPS?&lt;br /&gt;IMHO&lt;br /&gt;I think this camera will shoot like 6fps instead of the 9 of the D3. Clearly the d3 is a Press-camera, this will be a semipro full sensor.&lt;br /&gt;I think that next camera nikon will release will be a D3X or D4 with at least 24MP.&lt;br /&gt;;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hum&#8230;.. FPS?<br />IMHO<br />I think this camera will shoot like 6fps instead of the 9 of the D3. Clearly the d3 is a Press-camera, this will be a semipro full sensor.<br />I think that next camera nikon will release will be a D3X or D4 with at least 24MP.<br /> <img src='http://nikonrumors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Darden</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6839</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Darden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6839</guid>
		<description>This had better have a sensor cleaner on it or Nikon&#039;s going to be in trouble. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, is it me or is there no appreciable difference between this and the D3? All those D3 owners are going to feel pretty crappy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This had better have a sensor cleaner on it or Nikon&#8217;s going to be in trouble. </p>
<p>Also, is it me or is there no appreciable difference between this and the D3? All those D3 owners are going to feel pretty crappy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rad</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6838</link>
		<dc:creator>Rad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6838</guid>
		<description>If this is true, why would anyone buy a D3? Unless they are replacing the D3?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is true, why would anyone buy a D3? Unless they are replacing the D3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6837</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6837</guid>
		<description>those specs look real just missing one thing.... extandard iso down to 100 i wonder if it will have that or not
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those specs look real just missing one thing&#8230;. extandard iso down to 100 i wonder if it will have that or not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6836</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6836</guid>
		<description>Made in China maybe? I got them from a forum.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Made in China maybe? I got them from a forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr0</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6835</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6835</guid>
		<description>Uhhhhh, the biggest question to me is:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If these are the real specs, why are the heading comments in Chinese?  Wouldn&#039;t these things leak out from Japan instead of China?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhhhhh, the biggest question to me is:</p>
<p>If these are the real specs, why are the heading comments in Chinese?  Wouldn&#8217;t these things leak out from Japan instead of China?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mircea</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6834</link>
		<dc:creator>mircea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6834</guid>
		<description>Hi! Finnaly a tinme to upgrade from my D70. I have only one question: Shouldn&#039;t it also have a M mode? It says on the specs that it only has P, S, and A. I think it must have slipped...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! Finnaly a tinme to upgrade from my D70. I have only one question: Shouldn&#8217;t it also have a M mode? It says on the specs that it only has P, S, and A. I think it must have slipped&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo Rivas</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-6833</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo Rivas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/18/nikon-d700-specs-revealed.aspx#comment-6833</guid>
		<description>I WANT ONE!!!!!!!!!!!&lt;br /&gt;xD
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WANT ONE!!!!!!!!!!!<br />xD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

