Comments on: Nikon D10 http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/ where there’s smoke there’s fire Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:00:06 +0000 hourly 1 By: cray http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7257 cray Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:23:37 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7257 So we have a D10 and D700 - both mid range FX Nikons - D10 hinted at from accessory name and pics of a D700 brochure from Asia. I dont think both can be correct! So we have a D10 and D700 – both mid range FX Nikons – D10 hinted at from accessory name and pics of a D700 brochure from Asia. I dont think both can be correct!

]]> By: Blog Admin http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7256 Blog Admin Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:42:11 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7256 There is also pixelation around the left buttons (trigger) area if this is what you mean. There is also pixelation around the left buttons (trigger) area if this is what you mean.

]]> By: moksha http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7255 moksha Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:21:49 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7255 that's a very common compression artifact, not necessarily an indication that the image has been fooled around with. that’s a very common compression artifact, not necessarily an indication that the image has been fooled around with.

]]> By: Anon http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7254 Anon Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:05:56 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7254 The "D10" portion of the top pic is surrounded by pixelation (almost a perfect rectangle) while the rest of the area surrounding it doesn't. The “D10″ portion of the top pic is surrounded by pixelation (almost a perfect rectangle) while the rest of the area surrounding it doesn’t.

]]> By: nikon fan http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7253 nikon fan Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:06:38 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7253 All the big guys like Engadget, Gizmoto, dpreview were late on this news (they are all over it today) - it was reported first here.... 4 days ago All the big guys like Engadget, Gizmoto, dpreview were late on this news (they are all over it today) – it was reported first here…. 4 days ago

]]> By: Matthew Saville Photography http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7252 Matthew Saville Photography Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:59:13 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7252 Well, Canon's 5D has one edge, it's sensor. (For the price) Other than that, we have finally achieved stalemate. The D10 is the last piece of the puzzle. (provided the D3X is what we all assume it will be, a 24 MP FX 1Ds mk3 killer)<br /><br />So unless you need the (affordable) high ISO and shallow DOF that the 5D offers, (and are willing to put up with the ancient body that comes with it) ...Canon doesn't really have an edge. And since personally I manage to get by with the D300's high ISO performance and the DOF of f/1.8 and f/1.4 even on DX, Nikon has the edge for me by a long shot.<br /><br />Take care,<br />=Matt= Well, Canon’s 5D has one edge, it’s sensor. (For the price) Other than that, we have finally achieved stalemate. The D10 is the last piece of the puzzle. (provided the D3X is what we all assume it will be, a 24 MP FX 1Ds mk3 killer)

So unless you need the (affordable) high ISO and shallow DOF that the 5D offers, (and are willing to put up with the ancient body that comes with it) …Canon doesn’t really have an edge. And since personally I manage to get by with the D300′s high ISO performance and the DOF of f/1.8 and f/1.4 even on DX, Nikon has the edge for me by a long shot.

Take care,
=Matt=

]]> By: Blog Admin http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7251 Blog Admin Sun, 08 Jun 2008 11:00:04 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7251 Yes, we all have to admit that currently Canon has the edge. Yes, we all have to admit that currently Canon has the edge.

]]> By: Arterio http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7250 Arterio Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:09:16 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7250 I'm hoping it is real as well. It's about time that Nikon introduces a prosumer full frame digital SLR camera that competes well with Canon. I’m hoping it is real as well. It’s about time that Nikon introduces a prosumer full frame digital SLR camera that competes well with Canon.

]]> By: Josh Geyer http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7249 Josh Geyer Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:05:21 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7249 I think it's fake. Just because the MB-D10 battery grip wouldn't fit on it... But... I hope it's real! I think it’s fake. Just because the MB-D10 battery grip wouldn’t fit on it… But… I hope it’s real!

]]> By: Blog Admin http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7248 Blog Admin Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:49:59 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7248 I agree, the second picture looks fake, but the first one looks real. What is more interesting is where I found it: <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica; ">http://bayimg.com/. The slogan of this site is "NO COPYRIGHT. NO LICENSE - Free uncensored image hosting" If this was the product of an "artist" it will be all over the forums. I guess the person that posted it, wanted to keep low profile and did not want to leave any traces (you can submit to this site without registration). The picture was uploaded on 2008-05-20</span> I agree, the second picture looks fake, but the first one looks real. What is more interesting is where I found it: http://bayimg.com/. The slogan of this site is “NO COPYRIGHT. NO LICENSE – Free uncensored image hosting” If this was the product of an “artist” it will be all over the forums. I guess the person that posted it, wanted to keep low profile and did not want to leave any traces (you can submit to this site without registration). The picture was uploaded on 2008-05-20

]]> By: Chris http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7247 Chris Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:16:20 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7247 bottom bottom one is photoshopped. Look at the white above the camera. You can see where the person didn't clean up the background. No clue about the top photo, but I want it to be real. I have my fingers crossed that Nikon will release a:<br /><br />FX Camera with 16.5 megapixels<br />5+ FPS<br />around $3000 bottom bottom one is photoshopped. Look at the white above the camera. You can see where the person didn’t clean up the background. No clue about the top photo, but I want it to be real. I have my fingers crossed that Nikon will release a:

FX Camera with 16.5 megapixels
5+ FPS
around $3000

]]> By: Matthew Saville Photography http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7246 Matthew Saville Photography Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:33:09 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7246 Au contraire, that is definitely FX size I'd say. Still, probably photoshopped. It's just the D3 and D300 spliced together. They are definitely two different photoshop jobs too, cause the height of the viewfinder and the Nikon logo are vastly different between the light and dark images here. And why does the right-front corner of the body not turn up like the D300 does, so that it can fit the MB-D10 grip? Oh and even the "D10" font is different between these two images.<br /><br />=Matt= Au contraire, that is definitely FX size I’d say. Still, probably photoshopped. It’s just the D3 and D300 spliced together. They are definitely two different photoshop jobs too, cause the height of the viewfinder and the Nikon logo are vastly different between the light and dark images here. And why does the right-front corner of the body not turn up like the D300 does, so that it can fit the MB-D10 grip? Oh and even the “D10″ font is different between these two images.

=Matt=

]]> By: Chad http://nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7245 Chad Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:40:40 +0000 http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/06/06/nikon-d10.aspx#comment-7245 I think the mirror on the top photo looks too small to be an FX sensor. I think the mirror on the top photo looks too small to be an FX sensor.

]]>