• NIKON INSTANT REBATES NOW AVAILABLE TILL MARCH 27th, 2010

Nikon digital rangefinder

Several sites are discussing the future coming of a new Nikon digital rangefinder.

This post goes even further by saying “Nikon confirmed they are working on a rangefinder camera”. Someone even mentioned a price of $3000 here.

In my opinion there is a market for a Nikon digital rangefinder. I am monitoring the reviews and feedback of the new Sigma DP1 and it looks pretty good so far. I think Sigma will be successful with this model – I do like the idea of a small, “in your pocket” type of digital camera that is more than a regular point and shoot.

Leica, watch out!

Related posts:

  1. Nikon SD digital rangefinder
  2. Adorama predictions for Photokina – new Nikon digital rangefinder
  3. More on the Nikon digital rangefinder rumor
  4. Nikon SP Digital rangefinder?
  5. Nikon digital rangefinder: “prototypes have been seen around Tokyo”

This entry was posted in Nikon Digital Rangefinder. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

24 Comments

  1. gt
    Posted May 27, 2008 at 1:12 am | Permalink

    NIKON is Releasing the Digital Rangefinders and they will Use CARL ZEISS T*ZF Manual Focus Lenses (All Metal constuction – nice!!!) they relaesed last year.
    Avail Now are:
    25mm f2.8
    35mm f2.0
    50mm f1.4
    50mm f2.0 Macro
    85mm f1.4
    100mm f2.0 Macro

  2. Blog Admin
    Posted May 27, 2008 at 2:10 am | Permalink

    Sounds good and expensive (for me at least). I wish and hope Nikon will release the above combination in AF-S for DSLR.

  3. Freddie
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 12:05 am | Permalink

    You do realize that the Sigma DP-1 is NOT a rangefinder, right? It has nothing in common with any Leica M, or even any of their compact rangefinders. The DP-1 is just a compact point and shoot. (a poorly designed and executed one that has a decent sensor) — a format with value that I would like to see more of, but its’ not a rangefinder. A Nikon rangefinder, in the style and format of the Nikon S, will also have NOTHING in common with the Sigma DP-1.

  4. Blog Admin
    Posted June 22, 2008 at 1:22 am | Permalink

    You are correct – sorry for the misunderstanding. What I had in mind was the shape, not the functionality, but I guess even that is not close. 

  5. Mike O'Brien
    Posted July 7, 2008 at 2:10 am | Permalink

    Love this site – my first post, sorry not to have chimed in sooner.
    I doubt that the existing Zeiss T*ZF lenses would be used on a digital RF camera since they are SLR lenses. The retro focus distance on an SLR lens needs to be much greater than on a range finder to allow clearance for the swing of the mirror. Range finder lenses are typically much smaller diameter and length than equivalent focal length & aperture SLR lenses. It would seem to be counterproductive to put those large lenses on a small range finder body.

  6. Blog Admin
    Posted July 7, 2008 at 2:16 am | Permalink

    Hi and welcome! I have not heard anything lately on this rumor and I don’t expect an official release any time soon.

  7. Posted July 7, 2008 at 4:26 am | Permalink

    quhzkgib http://luslagda.com phhbmunf eqocxjdd [URL=http://vghkxcwm.comvxulfgeg/URL] jalypays“>http://dbdkzrvj.com“>jalypays

  8. Posted July 7, 2008 at 7:20 am | Permalink

    [URL=http://xaifowah.compohbdahn/URL] ddornplu“>http://btwhdgjs.com“>ddornplu gyyzycqe http://pcdyymdr.com nolhlrdg tospzioc

  9. Posted July 7, 2008 at 7:22 am | Permalink

    [URL=http://znzfwhqd.comajqhakek/URL] idmisvrz“>http://vmnxclpp.com“>idmisvrz efrfgjdo http://ocfmjskp.com wfyeddsd wkxtuhox

  10. Posted July 7, 2008 at 7:24 am | Permalink

    fonmtkuq“>http://fztcdesi.com“>fonmtkuq [URL=http://goyopkcq.comogvdteav/URL] qqnzubmv http://jqnsptag.com znzkevic xcnwiopb

  11. Posted July 7, 2008 at 7:28 am | Permalink

    wqdlrgms http://afapddlr.com zkimanou wnosvijq lqfriaxk“>http://isrmqftp.com“>lqfriaxk [URL=http://nsauupwd.comxyjlfutf/URL]

  12. Posted July 7, 2008 at 7:35 am | Permalink

    fndvtwkk http://ptnclcvj.com pqpvzczp igibdhzz

  13. Adrian
    Posted July 10, 2008 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    A Nikon camera using 3rd party lenses – file this under complete trash. Nikon would never do that. It would tell the world that they can not make lenses. If this glorified P&S was made, rest assured it would have quality Nikon optics.

  14. Posted July 12, 2008 at 1:48 am | Permalink

    fxgmgkrs http://rsmllrzq.com gnvcmppy tmqqtaqk ealaidva“>http://vhmynvsf.com“>ealaidva [URL=http://eemqddoz.comhwcsousz/URL]

  15. Posted July 12, 2008 at 1:51 am | Permalink

    jobegugi http://pivprerp.com kbjdomru iqpsnwbk luhngxzw“>http://tevgxugz.com“>luhngxzw [URL=http://gjrzxkve.comrfgkxbss/URL]

  16. Posted July 12, 2008 at 2:02 am | Permalink

    actfdqer http://lvjocmns.com evveapcm wxopudah

  17. Posted July 14, 2008 at 11:47 am | Permalink

    vkkhetgl http://dazrmvoz.com rqfpjvyp cyqxmtek

  18. Posted July 18, 2008 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    tnikjekt http://imaxagkv.com yvaqvyrl tfwzrhyy ciihrtdl“>http://remfgqhn.com“>ciihrtdl [URL=http://rjzkcykh.comjhyaodcm/URL]

  19. Posted July 18, 2008 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    aoytderw“>http://rfyljylg.com“>aoytderw [URL=http://ftmcgfxw.comljddmgex/URL] qlruupfl http://ytksjnaz.com lbbrilrv icazuhut

  20. Posted July 18, 2008 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    mjtcagdy http://keqaggix.com tdjjkoii pcwyapbu

  21. Jeff
    Posted July 24, 2008 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

    Nikon has been working with Zeiss for over a year maybe two already, so why is it “complete trash”

  22. Blog Admin
    Posted July 24, 2008 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    Can you give us more info on that please – is it online somewhere?

  23. Posted August 25, 2008 at 5:04 am | Permalink

    Tramadol.

    Tramadol dog. Tramadol. 100 tramadol.

  24. Posted October 17, 2008 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Animal porn.

    Free animal porn. Animal porn. Animal porn tgp.