<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D4 instead of Nikon D3x?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/</link>
	<description>where there’s smoke there’s fire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:08:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mithaq naaem</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-13385</link>
		<dc:creator>Mithaq naaem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-13385</guid>
		<description>I think the Nikon D4 is the top camera with out tha EOS 1Ds MARK III so as to the speed and ISO and fox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Nikon D4 is the top camera with out tha EOS 1Ds MARK III so as to the speed and ISO and fox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali Zaidi</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-10760</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali Zaidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-10760</guid>
		<description>Ha!!!  Told ya&#039;ll...  it was NEVER gonna be a D4... a D3x ?? Yes!! 

(read my post above)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!!!  Told ya&#8217;ll&#8230;  it was NEVER gonna be a D4&#8230; a D3x ?? Yes!! </p>
<p>(read my post above)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-10431</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-10431</guid>
		<description>I just spoke to a buddy @ Bel Air Camera who said the D3X uses the Sony chip from the A900.  Due out soon, but Sony required a no-compete requirement for a few months to jump start their A900 sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just spoke to a buddy @ Bel Air Camera who said the D3X uses the Sony chip from the A900.  Due out soon, but Sony required a no-compete requirement for a few months to jump start their A900 sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NR] admin</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-10188</link>
		<dc:creator>[NR] admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-10188</guid>
		<description>Do you have some insider info, or this is just your guess? Let me know - email me and I will keep your name private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have some insider info, or this is just your guess? Let me know &#8211; email me and I will keep your name private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve1734</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-10159</link>
		<dc:creator>steve1734</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-10159</guid>
		<description>It will be D3x, 24.4mpix and the sensor is made by Kodak. Early December 2008. The D3 will drop in price as will the D700. The D300 may get an upgrade as the D90 is better than it now.
This will make the 13mp D3 outstanding value as it is already hurting sales of Canon 1Ds Mk3. For Journos and sports the D3 will consolidate at US4$k and blow Canon away. The main reason is that the 24mp file sizes are just too large for pj&#039;s and unnecessary. They have what they need at 13mp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be D3x, 24.4mpix and the sensor is made by Kodak. Early December 2008. The D3 will drop in price as will the D700. The D300 may get an upgrade as the D90 is better than it now.<br />
This will make the 13mp D3 outstanding value as it is already hurting sales of Canon 1Ds Mk3. For Journos and sports the D3 will consolidate at US4$k and blow Canon away. The main reason is that the 24mp file sizes are just too large for pj&#8217;s and unnecessary. They have what they need at 13mp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-10106</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-10106</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why people go STUPID over simple things!!!

After the D2.. there&#039;s a pattern.. D2.. D2h/D2x... D3.. and obv. now a D3x. Why would Nikon come up with a D4 and skip on the nomenclature D3x ??

Also, they ALWAYS bring out a small brother with the big brother... for a Consumer market and a Prosumer market. I am sure there is going to be a D400... and following the footsteps of D700, later on a D900.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why people go STUPID over simple things!!!</p>
<p>After the D2.. there&#8217;s a pattern.. D2.. D2h/D2x&#8230; D3.. and obv. now a D3x. Why would Nikon come up with a D4 and skip on the nomenclature D3x ??</p>
<p>Also, they ALWAYS bring out a small brother with the big brother&#8230; for a Consumer market and a Prosumer market. I am sure there is going to be a D400&#8230; and following the footsteps of D700, later on a D900.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael A Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-8433</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael A Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-8433</guid>
		<description>I just came here looking for news, but found the last post, instead.  I felt I needed to respond to it.

It is not a matter of coming up short for the format.  The lower the pixel density, the better.  The d3/d700 are about the best there are for density which is why they have the cleanest files.  AS for the 5:4, I use it all the time, but it is a convenience; you&#039;re cutting pixels off when you use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came here looking for news, but found the last post, instead.  I felt I needed to respond to it.</p>
<p>It is not a matter of coming up short for the format.  The lower the pixel density, the better.  The d3/d700 are about the best there are for density which is why they have the cleanest files.  AS for the 5:4, I use it all the time, but it is a convenience; you&#8217;re cutting pixels off when you use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill nelson</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7798</link>
		<dc:creator>bill nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-7798</guid>
		<description>The D-3 and D-700 come up short in the  resolution department for the FX format. The D-300 DX functions at 178 pixels / millimeter while the two FX cameras come up short at 110 pixels / mm..  The D-700 is also lacking the 5:4 (8X10, 16X20, etc) format of the D-3... Why waste pixels that you will have to crop off the FX(35mm) image? We need a 24.2 Megapixel FX/DX model and the D4 designation is a logical progression... The continuous frame rates on the D3 are more than adequate(don&#039;t waste money on speeding up the continuous frames/second... We need resolution and don&#039;t worry about storage, high density hard drives (above 500 gigabytes) are not yet a &quot;dime a dozen&quot; they are now cheaper than 20 MEGABYTE hard drives were when IBM released the PC/XT more than twenty-years ago....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D-3 and D-700 come up short in the  resolution department for the FX format. The D-300 DX functions at 178 pixels / millimeter while the two FX cameras come up short at 110 pixels / mm..  The D-700 is also lacking the 5:4 (8X10, 16X20, etc) format of the D-3&#8230; Why waste pixels that you will have to crop off the FX(35mm) image? We need a 24.2 Megapixel FX/DX model and the D4 designation is a logical progression&#8230; The continuous frame rates on the D3 are more than adequate(don&#8217;t waste money on speeding up the continuous frames/second&#8230; We need resolution and don&#8217;t worry about storage, high density hard drives (above 500 gigabytes) are not yet a &#8220;dime a dozen&#8221; they are now cheaper than 20 MEGABYTE hard drives were when IBM released the PC/XT more than twenty-years ago&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikas</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7797</link>
		<dc:creator>vikas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-7797</guid>
		<description>Too much delays from Nikon side to release something with reasonable mp..
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too much delays from Nikon side to release something with reasonable mp..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7796</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-7796</guid>
		<description>I suppose the decision to use the number 4 lies with Nikon, but if I may mention the C word? Canon jumped from their Powershot S3is to the powershot S5is.   Whatever Nikon call a new model I&#039;m sure it will be interesting.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose the decision to use the number 4 lies with Nikon, but if I may mention the C word? Canon jumped from their Powershot S3is to the powershot S5is.   Whatever Nikon call a new model I&#8217;m sure it will be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jelani</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7795</link>
		<dc:creator>Jelani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-7795</guid>
		<description>4 can be either shi or yon depending on use.  and Death or die is Shi-ne
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 can be either shi or yon depending on use.  and Death or die is Shi-ne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7794</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-7794</guid>
		<description>Actually, the number 4, when pronounced &quot;shi&quot; in Japanese, does sound like death.  The verb for die is &quot;shinu&quot;.  Death is abbreviate simply as &quot;shi&quot; when used in compound Japanese words like &quot;karoushi&quot;, which means to die from overwork.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the number 4, when pronounced &#8220;shi&#8221; in Japanese, does sound like death.  The verb for die is &#8220;shinu&#8221;.  Death is abbreviate simply as &#8220;shi&#8221; when used in compound Japanese words like &#8220;karoushi&#8221;, which means to die from overwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOB</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7786</link>
		<dc:creator>BOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-7786</guid>
		<description>Hogwash, so quickly have you forgotten that there was an F4 so no reason why there should not be a D4.............
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hogwash, so quickly have you forgotten that there was an F4 so no reason why there should not be a D4&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dino</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7770</link>
		<dc:creator>dino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-7770</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but if in May they suppose to reveal it in April there&#039;s clearly something wrong !!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but if in May they suppose to reveal it in April there&#8217;s clearly something wrong !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colouredwolf</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7769</link>
		<dc:creator>colouredwolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-7769</guid>
		<description>Well, 4 sounds like death only in Chinese - not i Japan. And China won&#039;t the the biggest market for a D4.&lt;br /&gt;Price is interesting as converted to € it&#039;s just the same price as the D3
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, 4 sounds like death only in Chinese &#8211; not i Japan. And China won&#8217;t the the biggest market for a D4.<br />Price is interesting as converted to € it&#8217;s just the same price as the D3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maik</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7768</link>
		<dc:creator>Maik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-7768</guid>
		<description>Not reasonable as the F4 had been released as well many years ago.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I expect that Nikon will use the name D4 as soon as a body/sensor combination will have similar features as the F4 body had in former days.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not reasonable as the F4 had been released as well many years ago.</p>
<p>I expect that Nikon will use the name D4 as soon as a body/sensor combination will have similar features as the F4 body had in former days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx/comment-page-1/#comment-7767</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nikonrumors.com/http:/nikonrumors.com/2008/05/15/nikon-d4-instead-of-nikon-d3x.aspx#comment-7767</guid>
		<description>There is almost no chance for a D4.&lt;br /&gt;4 in japanese sounds (when pronounced) like death. Which is why Japanese do not like to use this number (standalone)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is almost no chance for a D4.<br />4 in japanese sounds (when pronounced) like death. Which is why Japanese do not like to use this number (standalone)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

